2021
DOI: 10.1177/19714009211042881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Therapeutic dilemmas regarding giant aneurysms of the intracranial vertebral artery causing medulla oblongata compression

Abstract: Background Giant aneurysms of the intracranial vertebral artery are very rare cerebrovascular lesions. Due to the rarity of these aneurysms, we know little about them. Methods We performed a systematic review of the English literature by searching the PubMed database. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) the full text was available and (b) complete clinical data were available. Results A total of 45 articles were identified, containing 53 patients (53 aneurysms). The patients were aged from 5 to 77 year… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another disadvantage of the PICA-PICA bypass is the possibility of damaging the contralateral PICA. In addition, prolonged clamping or bypass occlusion may endanger the bilateral PICA, resulting in irreversible ischemic complications in the bilateral cerebellum [11].Furthermore, the PICA-PICA bypass has a disadvantage in that it requires an entirely different anastomotic procedure than the super cial temporal artery (STA)-middle cerebral artery (MCA) bypass, which is unfamiliar to most neurosurgeons [16]. The technique also necessitates suturing in a deeper lumen, making this anastomosis technically challenging [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another disadvantage of the PICA-PICA bypass is the possibility of damaging the contralateral PICA. In addition, prolonged clamping or bypass occlusion may endanger the bilateral PICA, resulting in irreversible ischemic complications in the bilateral cerebellum [11].Furthermore, the PICA-PICA bypass has a disadvantage in that it requires an entirely different anastomotic procedure than the super cial temporal artery (STA)-middle cerebral artery (MCA) bypass, which is unfamiliar to most neurosurgeons [16]. The technique also necessitates suturing in a deeper lumen, making this anastomosis technically challenging [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another disadvantage of the PICA-PICA bypass is the possibility of damaging the contralateral PICA. In addition, prolonged clamping or bypass occlusion may endanger the bilateral PICA, resulting in irreversible ischemic complications in the bilateral cerebellum [ 13 ]. Furthermore, the PICA-PICA bypass has a disadvantage in that it requires an entirely different anastomotic procedure than the superficial temporal artery (STA)-middle cerebral artery (MCA) bypass, which is unfamiliar to most neurosurgeons [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For large and giant intracranial aneurysms, after EVT, the aneurysms can enlarge due to thrombosis, and an occupying effect can occur or become aggravated ( 69 ). In a report by Wang et al, 22 symptomatic patients with VBD underwent EVT; of them, 13 (54.2%, 13/24) presented with compressive symptoms, and 7 (54%, 7/13) died from severe progressive brainstem compression ( 62 ).…”
Section: Evt Prognosis and Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%