1997
DOI: 10.1006/smim.1997.0067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TheRAD52epistasis group in mammalian double strand break repair

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
50
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The genetic analysis of the repair of DSBs indicates that it involves recombinational processes. While DSBs can be repaired by homologous recombination in an error-free manner in yeast (Petrini et al, 1997), this mechanism is apparently uncommon in mammalian cells and most DSBs appear to be repaired by an illegitimate recombination process that is error-prone and thus likely accounts for many of the potentially mutagenic DNA lesions induced by radiation. This process of non-homologous end rejoining involves protein complexes, such as the well-characterized DNA ± PK complex, the kinase activity being dependent upon the binding of the Ku protein to the broken DNA ends (Singleton et al, 1999), or the one which includes hRad50 and hMre11 (Carney et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genetic analysis of the repair of DSBs indicates that it involves recombinational processes. While DSBs can be repaired by homologous recombination in an error-free manner in yeast (Petrini et al, 1997), this mechanism is apparently uncommon in mammalian cells and most DSBs appear to be repaired by an illegitimate recombination process that is error-prone and thus likely accounts for many of the potentially mutagenic DNA lesions induced by radiation. This process of non-homologous end rejoining involves protein complexes, such as the well-characterized DNA ± PK complex, the kinase activity being dependent upon the binding of the Ku protein to the broken DNA ends (Singleton et al, 1999), or the one which includes hRad50 and hMre11 (Carney et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HRR utilizes extensive homology to faithfully restore the DNA sequence around the DSB either by gene conversion or, less frequently, by the non-conservative process of single-strand annealing Haber, 1992;Kanaar et al, 1998;Petes et al, 1991;Petrini et al, 1997;Resnick, 1976;Shinohara and Ogawa, 1995;Szostak et al, 1983;Thacker, 1999;Thompson and Schild, 1999). NHEJ directly rejoins the two ends of the DNA molecule at the site of the DNA DSB without any requirement for homologous DNA sequences, and without necessarily restoring the sequence around the DSB (Jackson and Jeggo, 1995;Jeggo, 1998;Lieber et al, 1997;Weaver, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NHEJ directly rejoins the two ends of the DNA molecule at the site of the DNA DSB without any requirement for homologous DNA sequences, and without necessarily restoring the sequence around the DSB (Jackson and Jeggo, 1995;Jeggo, 1998;Lieber et al, 1997;Weaver, 1996). There are striking similarities in the molecular mechanism of HRR and NHEJ between higher and lower eukaryotes, and several homologues of the RAD52 epistasis group of genes have been cloned in mammalian cells and shown to have biochemical functions similar to those determined in yeast Kanaar et al, 1998;Petrini et al, 1997;Shinohara and Ogawa, 1995;Thacker, 1999;Thompson and Schild, 1999). Also, genes implicated in NHEJ in mammalian cells such as KU, and DNA ligase IV have been found in yeast and shown to function similarly Jackson, 1996a,b, 1998;Grawunder et al, 1998a,b;Siede et al, 1996;Teo and Jackson, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ScRad52 protein alone or a heterodimer of ScRad55 and ScRad57 functions as a cofactor in this reaction, probably by overcoming the inhibitory effect of replication protein A (32,45,49,50). Recently, ScRad54 has been shown to stimulate the pairing reaction (36).Homologues of most of the RAD52 group genes in S. cerevisiae have been identified in other yeast strains as well as in higher eukaryotes (1,15,26,30,35,53). As in yeast, physical interactions between HsRad51 and HsRad52 and between HsRad51 and HsRad54 proteins have been observed in mammals (17, 42).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%