2013
DOI: 10.1057/9781137312624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theosis, Sino-Christian Theology and the Second Chinese Enlightenment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TSPM and CCC leaders have recognised the low theological level of the officially-sanctioned church, while the more traditional house churches have tended towards a 'primitivist Christianity' which emphasises conversion and supernatural acts of healing or prophecy. 60 Hence, some of the more philosophical debates within the Calvinist tradition (e.g., the insistence on divine monergism 61 ) have had difficulty squaring with the Chinese mindset. Moreover, China's push towards rapid urbanisation has resulted in a noticeable migrant worker population moving from rural farmlands to urban metropolises, many of whom would likely have not had the same academic education as China's public theologians.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TSPM and CCC leaders have recognised the low theological level of the officially-sanctioned church, while the more traditional house churches have tended towards a 'primitivist Christianity' which emphasises conversion and supernatural acts of healing or prophecy. 60 Hence, some of the more philosophical debates within the Calvinist tradition (e.g., the insistence on divine monergism 61 ) have had difficulty squaring with the Chinese mindset. Moreover, China's push towards rapid urbanisation has resulted in a noticeable migrant worker population moving from rural farmlands to urban metropolises, many of whom would likely have not had the same academic education as China's public theologians.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alexander Chow (2013) compares three outstanding 20th‐century Chinese Christian thinkers, Watchman Nee (or Ni Tuosheng), T. C. Chao (or Zhao Zichen), and K. H. Ting (or Ding Guangxun), and presents a theoretical framework by analyzing a Chinese worldview of tianren heyi , or heaven and humanity in unity with theosis . Wang Jue (2021, p. 115) offers her critique of transhumanism and concludes that Confucianism “cannot accept transhumanism (due to the Confucian notion of ‘the unity of heaven and [humanity]’.” For Wang, transhumanism severs the relationship between heaven and humanity and falls into an egocentric antithesis of heaven and humanity.…”
Section: Implications For a Constructive Chinese Theological Response...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final two constructive chapters will explore how the Confucian imagination also offers a unique tendency in Chinese public theology to prioritize questions related to transcendence and ecclesiology. Building on my previous work on the Eastern Orthodox understanding of theosis and the Chinese understanding of the unity of Heaven and humanity (Tian ren heyi), 63 Chapter 6 will engage Aristotle Papanikolaou's recent work on political theology and argue the case for Chinese Christianity to have an integrative theology which pursues a Divine-human unity as the foundation for the theologian and the church to engage the state and the society. 64 Chapter 7 will underscore the important place of ecclesiology in the formation of a Chinese public theology.…”
Section: Structure Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%