1975
DOI: 10.1063/1.430632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of unsymmetric polymer–polymer interfaces

Abstract: Solutions have been obtained to equations which described the interface between two immiscible polymers and are more general than the equations first introduced by Helfand and Tagami. Gaussian random−walk statistics are assumed for the macromolecules. As a consequence of the present work, limitations of the earlier theory are removed, particularly the assumption that the properties of the two polymers when pure are identical. Calculations are performed for a variety of polymers and comparison with experiment i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
290
3
2

Year Published

1983
1983
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 442 publications
(313 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
18
290
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover they do not follow the Gibbs equation [31]. Poser and Sanchez theory [10] is similar to our one except that their gradient coefficient is kept constant while a mean field theory predicts a ø -1 dependence [27,32].…”
Section: Physics Abstractsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Moreover they do not follow the Gibbs equation [31]. Poser and Sanchez theory [10] is similar to our one except that their gradient coefficient is kept constant while a mean field theory predicts a ø -1 dependence [27,32].…”
Section: Physics Abstractsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Be aware that our derivation is specific to the case where A and B segments have equal statistical length (i.e., a = a A = a B ). For the general case of a A = a B , the interfacial profile deviates from the sigmodial shape [38], and thus one needs to solve the Euler-Lagrange equation for φ(z).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the typical value in Ref. [49], the force is in the order of nN, which is in the range of Ref. [50].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%