1989
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.39.4854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of stochastic resonance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

20
923
3
9

Year Published

1993
1993
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,495 publications
(977 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
20
923
3
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The first prediction of a phase shift seems to have been due to Nicolis (2) who concluded that, for an overdamped system fluctuating in a bistable potential, φ = −arctan(Ω/W (0) ) where W (0) is the sum of the transition rates out of each of the potential wells; similar results were also obtained by McNamara and Wiesenfeld (12) . On the other hand, Gammaitoni et al, claimed (9) that analog simulations (10) as well as numerical computations (15) "had ruled out [the phase shifts] as apparently spurious".…”
Section: Phase Shifts In Stochastic Resonancesupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first prediction of a phase shift seems to have been due to Nicolis (2) who concluded that, for an overdamped system fluctuating in a bistable potential, φ = −arctan(Ω/W (0) ) where W (0) is the sum of the transition rates out of each of the potential wells; similar results were also obtained by McNamara and Wiesenfeld (12) . On the other hand, Gammaitoni et al, claimed (9) that analog simulations (10) as well as numerical computations (15) "had ruled out [the phase shifts] as apparently spurious".…”
Section: Phase Shifts In Stochastic Resonancesupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Overall, it follows from (12), (13) (see also Fig. 2 where φ vs D as given by (12) is plotted) that the phase shift displays a resonance-type (nonmonotonic) behaviour as a function of the noise intensity D. This prediction is in contrast with the earlier theories (2,12) for two-state systems displaying SR in the signal-to-noise ratio, but exhibiting a monotonic dependence of |φ| on D; the phase shift in these theories is described by Eq. (13) with Ω r set equal to ∞ (if the intrawell relaxation was infinitely fast the intrawell motion would not come into play and the system would behave as a two-state one):…”
Section: Phase Shifts In Stochastic Resonancecontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Such an effect is seen when the response of a system to a drive depends non-monotonically on noise, with an optimum at a moderate, non-zero, noise level. There are many pointers in the literature to physical evidences of stochastic resonance in physical systems [69,11,23,24,47,71,70], and in models of neurons [8,42,55,54]. In living systems stochastic resonance has been reported in crayfish mechanoreceptors [16], the cricket cercal sensory system [40], neural slices [27], hippocampus [72], and the cortex [48].…”
Section: A Relation To Stochastic Resonance: Model Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of approximation of diffusions in potential landscapes by appropriate finite state Markov chains in the context of stochastic resonance was suggested by Eckmann and Thomas [6], and C. Nicolis [15], and developed by McNamara and Wiesenfeld [14]. In this section we follow [17,13].…”
Section: The 'Effective Dynamics': Two-state Markov Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%