1991
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.44.4931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of second-harmonic generation in strongly scattering media

Abstract: Second-harmonic generation is studied in a medium which is both nonlinear and disordered.Disorder-induced strong elastic scattering of both a fundamental and second-harmonic light gives rise to a diffusionlike regime of light propagation. The interference eftects, which cannot be described by the di8'usion approximation, are taken into account. They are shown to lead to a sharp peak in the angular distribution of second-harmonic intensity. The direction of the maximum second-harmonic intensity is found to be r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, several authors started to address the issue of what would happen in the nonlinear optical regime. In particular, Kravtsov, Agranovich, and Grigorishin 7 showed that in the case of secondharmonic generation ͑due to 2 nonlinear susceptibility 8 ͒ the EBS peak height for second-harmonic light is very much reduced from the usual factor of 2, due to the restriction that only second-harmonic light generated near the sample surface contributes to the EBS signal, whereas those generated anywhere in the bulk contribute to the diffuse background. Later Agranovich and Kravtsov 9 predicted that when the 3 nonlinear susceptibility 8 is taken into account, the EBS peak function of linear optics must be modified by the appearance of a narrow ''dip'' very close to the backscattering direction, although this result has recently been challenged by Heiderich, Maynard, and van Tiggelen.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several authors started to address the issue of what would happen in the nonlinear optical regime. In particular, Kravtsov, Agranovich, and Grigorishin 7 showed that in the case of secondharmonic generation ͑due to 2 nonlinear susceptibility 8 ͒ the EBS peak height for second-harmonic light is very much reduced from the usual factor of 2, due to the restriction that only second-harmonic light generated near the sample surface contributes to the EBS signal, whereas those generated anywhere in the bulk contribute to the diffuse background. Later Agranovich and Kravtsov 9 predicted that when the 3 nonlinear susceptibility 8 is taken into account, the EBS peak function of linear optics must be modified by the appearance of a narrow ''dip'' very close to the backscattering direction, although this result has recently been challenged by Heiderich, Maynard, and van Tiggelen.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem has been studied in nonlinear media with cubic nonlinearity (Kerr effect) and proved to be a nontrivial one [6,7]. On the other hand, the lowest-order nonlinear effects -those quadratic in the wave field -have also been considered in the limit l * << l NL [8]. Recent theoretical [9,10] and experimental [11] work suggests that even the simplest realization of a nonlinear disordered medium, a dilute suspension of spherical particles, exhibits a rather unexpected and nontrivial behavior: second harmonic (SH) is generated by a single spherical particle despite its central symmetry and seemingly prohibited second-order nonlinear effects, and a measurable SH signal can be obtained from a dilute suspension of such particles in a single scattering regime [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The satisfaction of this requirement in a given experiment ensures a simple quadratic dependence of I 2v on molecular density. Theoretical work has begun to address wave vector matching in complex environments such as glasses [12] and porous media [13]. We take the wave vector matching condition to be satisfied in our samples, as predicted by theory for films thinner than the elastic scattering length for v and 2v photons [13], and confirmed a posteriori by the resulting fits to the data, which are based on a quadratic density dependence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%