1985
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.32.1189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of second-harmonic generation in nematic liquid crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since it is generally accepted that the walls of the nanotubes are conformed by an amorphous centro-symmetric structure, formed by the aggregation of nanoparticles with sizes ranging from 2.5 to 4 nm and conformed by tetra and hexacoordinated aluminum (AlO 4 and AlO 6 polyhedral units) [51,52], no SHG is produced by the PR-AAM. Only very weak and negligible surface SHG-effects (generally detected by Lock-In amplification) may arise due to the symmetry breakdown typical of surfaces and interfaces or according to the quadrupolemoment mechanism [53,54]. This amorphous structure has been verified in our reference samples by X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements (not shown here, [49]) where a broad XRD-spectra has been observed.…”
Section: Nlo -Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Since it is generally accepted that the walls of the nanotubes are conformed by an amorphous centro-symmetric structure, formed by the aggregation of nanoparticles with sizes ranging from 2.5 to 4 nm and conformed by tetra and hexacoordinated aluminum (AlO 4 and AlO 6 polyhedral units) [51,52], no SHG is produced by the PR-AAM. Only very weak and negligible surface SHG-effects (generally detected by Lock-In amplification) may arise due to the symmetry breakdown typical of surfaces and interfaces or according to the quadrupolemoment mechanism [53,54]. This amorphous structure has been verified in our reference samples by X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements (not shown here, [49]) where a broad XRD-spectra has been observed.…”
Section: Nlo -Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Hence we discount SMHRS as a significant contributor to the nematic phase SH signal. [49] Using a description of SHG in dielectric media, incorporating intermolecular interactions, [50][51][52] collective effects [19,53] and surface interactions, [17,18] we examine the sources of the SH signal in the nematic phase. The second-order non-linear or SH polarisation P 2 ð Þ induced in such a medium by the electric field of the electromagnetic wave traversing the medium is given by [49] …”
Section: Source Of Sh Lightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of their relative magnitudes, the second term is very weak compared to the third term in a nematic LC. [53] One of our initial assumptions is that the contribution from the surface polarisation to the SH signal, described by the fourth term, is negligible. [49] The dominant contribution to the SH signal in the nematic phase thus comes from the third term, χ $ ð3Þ E P EE.…”
Section: Source Of Sh Lightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For SHG in NLC, the subsidiary nonlinear polarization P (2ui) associated with curvature strain in given by [1] di y p" i (2w)= X . ..…”
Section: Nlmentioning
confidence: 99%