1989
DOI: 10.1351/pac198961030361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of rhodopsin activation: probable charge redistribution of excited state chromophore

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The present results rule out efficient photoexcitation by 11-cislocked retinals in rods. This is in contrast to results with Chlamydomonas, where analogue 4 was reported to produce sensitivity 55 times greater than analogue 3 and 1.8 times greater than retinal 1 (25)(26)(27).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The present results rule out efficient photoexcitation by 11-cislocked retinals in rods. This is in contrast to results with Chlamydomonas, where analogue 4 was reported to produce sensitivity 55 times greater than analogue 3 and 1.8 times greater than retinal 1 (25)(26)(27).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…From this large set of reconstitution experiments the authors came to surprising conclusions, which initiated a wide confusion among rhodopsin researchers: (i) protonation of the imine N is not required for rhodopsin activation; (ii) no particular regiospecific isomerisation is required; and (iii) the rhodopsin can be activated even when retinal is replaced by hexenal or hexanal, which contain only one C = C double bond or even none at all. They proposed that rhodopsin might be activated by a 'charge redistribution of the excited state chromophore' [7,9]. Later, by using a light scattering assay and different motion analysis systems, three groups independently analysed flash-induced behavioural responses by using a mutant named CC2359, which is completely blind under all known conditions.…”
Section: Controversial Perspectives About the Rhodopsin Photoreceptormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This point was confirmed with analogs showing that this charge redistribution or displacement is necessary for initiating the bacteriorhodopsin photocycle (44). Hence, it would seem reasonable for the sensory role of rhodopsins in Peranema, Chlamydomonas, and Allomyces (13,14,15,29), for which the n-hexenal is an active chromophore, that a similar charge displacement in the photoreceptor protein is sufficient to drive a conformation change and activation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…n-Hexenal was also active with rhodopsin in the bikont Chlamydomonas (13,14,15) and in the zoospore of the unikont chytridiomycete fungus Allomyces (34). In Chlamydomonas, n-hexenal recovered the sensitivity of phototaxis at 354 nm to 2.9 orders of magnitude above the background, with no loss of sensitivity relative to the native chromophore and with an action spectrum consistent for n-hexenal-opsin amply demonstrating its activity (29). Whether this property has evolved to be different in animals has not been adequately tested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%