2007
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.99.170404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of rf-Spectroscopy of Strongly Interacting Fermions

Abstract: We show that strong pairing correlations in Fermi gases lead to the appearance of a gaplike structure in the rf spectrum, both in the balanced superfluid and in the normal phase above the Clogston-Chandrasekhar limit. The average rf shift of a unitary gas is proportional to the ratio of the Fermi velocity and the scattering length with the final state. In the strongly imbalanced case, the rf spectrum measures the binding energy of a minority atom to the Fermi sea of majority atoms. Our results provide a qualit… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
130
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
130
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will show that such a Fermi liquid is perfectly consistent with the experiment of Ref. 19, and that the observed shift in the RF spectrum of the minority atoms is the result of large self-energy effects due to the Feshbach resonant scattering, as also emphasized in parallel recent studies [32,33,34]. Based on this we suggest that a far better test of the nature of the ground state is a measurement of the momentum distribution n 2 (k) of the minority atoms; in the following the label σ = 1, 2 denotes the majority and minority species, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We will show that such a Fermi liquid is perfectly consistent with the experiment of Ref. 19, and that the observed shift in the RF spectrum of the minority atoms is the result of large self-energy effects due to the Feshbach resonant scattering, as also emphasized in parallel recent studies [32,33,34]. Based on this we suggest that a far better test of the nature of the ground state is a measurement of the momentum distribution n 2 (k) of the minority atoms; in the following the label σ = 1, 2 denotes the majority and minority species, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The recent RF spectroscopy experiments on a strongly polarized Fermi gas [19,27], have rekindled theoretical studies of such a system with a focus on the unitarity regime [28,29,30] and its strong interactions in the normal state [31,32,33,34,35,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here a is the s-wave scattering length and we use a i (a f ) for the initial (a,b) (final (a,c)) interactions. As discussed in detail below, final state interactions severely affect the rf dissociation spectra when |k F a f | > 1 [13,14,15]. To overcome this problem, one has to change the interactions in the final state without changing those in the initial one.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most recent experiments on 6 Li the states involved are the three lowest energy hyperfine states |↑ = |1 , |↓ = |2 and |x = |3 , (E 1 < E 2 < E 3 ) though other combinations are possible [22]. The spectrum I(ν) measures, for a fixed probe intensity, the rate of population transfer from ↓ to x as a function of the detuning ν from the free-space resonance.In principle, moments of this spectrum can be calculated from the sum rule [11,12,13],, where v ij (r) is the interaction potential between atoms in states i and j, and ψ σ is an annihilation operator. As pointed out by Pethick and Stoof [23], extracting useful information from this result is problematic because this expectation value (which is closely related to the expectation value of the interaction energy) is not a low energy observable: different potentials which give rise to the same low energy scattering properties will give completely different values forν; hard spheres haveν = 0, while point interaction yield ν = ∞.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We quantify our arguments by presenting a simplified calculation of the spectrum of a trapped two-component Fermi gas in the limit n ↓ /n ↑ → 0. Although we include final-state interactions [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19] in our quantitative calculations, we emphasize that the bimodality is not a final-state effect. In the highly polarized limit, final state effects set the frequency scale for the spectral line but do not significantly change its shape or temperature dependence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%