2015
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/17/6/063027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of radiation pressure on magneto–dielectric materials

Abstract: We present a classical linear response theory for a magneto-dielectric material and determine the polariton dispersion relations. The electromagnetic field fluctuation spectra are obtained and polariton sum rules for their optical parameters are presented. The electromagnetic field for systems with multiple polariton branches is quantized in three dimensions and field operators are converted to 1-dimensional forms appropriate for parallel light beams. We show that the field-operator commutation relations agree… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pleasingly, this approach leads to a force density [7] that agrees with that proposed by Einstein and Laub [8].…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…Pleasingly, this approach leads to a force density [7] that agrees with that proposed by Einstein and Laub [8].…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…In view of the field equations, P µ is a constant, and so we find by using Eqs. (15) and (16) that Eq. (13) is valid if P µ is replaced by P µ .…”
Section: A Configuration Spacementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Of course, the ultimate proof of validity of a physical theory is its compliance with experimental observations. The debate as to which stress tensor represents physical reality is very much alive today and the interested reader should consult the vast literature onthe subject [23,24,27,[32][33][34][35][36][37]. The present author believes that several appealing features of the Einstein-Laub theory recommend it as a universal theory of EM force and momentum [26,28,38], but there are others who prefer alternative formulations [27,32,33].…”
Section: ´=-mentioning
confidence: 99%