2001
DOI: 10.1177/1363275201006001004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of Mind, Executive Function and Social Competence in Boys with ADHD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, ToM deficit seems to exist reliably for children with ASD. For ADHD children, the results showed that the ADHD group did as well as the normal group in ToM tasks, which confirms earlier studies [12][13][14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, ToM deficit seems to exist reliably for children with ASD. For ADHD children, the results showed that the ADHD group did as well as the normal group in ToM tasks, which confirms earlier studies [12][13][14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A survey of the literature reveals mounting evidence that children with ADHD have unimpaired ToM but executive dysfunction [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding may form an important point of attention in evaluating children with suspected ToM problems. The inter-rater reliability of scoring the justifications is high (Cohen's Kappa [0.80, namely 0.81-0.97, even concerning the more stringent scoring criterion) (see also Charman et al 2001;Muris et al 1999). There were no differences in difficulty in judging the justifications of typically developing children versus children with PDD-NOS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The child sits at the left side of the administrator, so it can see the drawings clearly (the drawings are on the left side of the book, while the accompanying text for the experimenter can be found on the right side). The drawings remain in front of the child during the questioning in order to prevent mistakes due to memory requirements (in agreement with Charman et al 2001).…”
Section: Testing Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The notion that a more molecular analysis of behavioral constructs or clinical phenotypes may be helpful in understanding the etiology of ASD (and neurobehavioral disorders in general) is addressed in three thoughtful reviews by Abrahams and Geschwind (2008), Belmonte et al (2004), and Szatmari et al (2007). Owing to the implications of (a) social cognition deficits for aggression in boys, particularly less verbal ones (Werner et al 2006), (b) findings that children at-risk for ADHD were not found to be impaired when completing advanced social cognition tasks compared to controls (Charman et al 2001;Perner et al 2002), (c) the importance of genetic factors in the etiology of both ASD (e.g., Ronald et al 2005;Rutter et al 1999) andCMTD (e.g., Comings et al 1996;Grados et al 2008), and (d) the role of environmental variables in child aggression (Bohman 1996;Cadoret et al 1995;Rutter et al 1999), it is reasonable to assume that biologic substrates of ASD, ADHD, and CMTD may interact with environmental variables resulting in different patterns of ODD and CD behaviors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%