2000
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9507.00125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of Mind and Peer Rejection at School

Abstract: Registro de acceso restringido Este recurso no está disponible en acceso abierto por política de la editorial. No obstante, se puede acceder al texto completo desde la Universitat Jaume I o si el usuario cuenta con suscripción. Registre d'accés restringit Aquest recurs no està disponible en accés obert per política de l'editorial. No obstant això, es pot accedir al text complet des de la Universitat Jaume I o si l'usuari compta amb subscripció. Restricted access item This item isn't open access because of publ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
60
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
7
60
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, among hard-to-manage preschoolers, negative behaviors toward friends appear to show specific associations with deficits in executive function rather than in false belief understanding Hughes, White, Sharpen, & Dunn, 2000). In addition, studies of peer rejection in 4-to 6-yearolds indicate only modest relations with theory-of-mind performance (Badenes, Estevan, & Bacete, 2000;Slaughter, Dennis, & Pritchard, 2002; but see also Peterson & Siegal, 2002). Similarly, in a longitudinal study of British children who were adopted from Romanian orphanages (Colvert et al, 2008), emotional difficulties at 11 years of age were found to be related to prior deficits in emotion recognition but not to deficits in false belief understanding.…”
Section: Early False Belief Understanding Predicts the Quality Of Latmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, among hard-to-manage preschoolers, negative behaviors toward friends appear to show specific associations with deficits in executive function rather than in false belief understanding Hughes, White, Sharpen, & Dunn, 2000). In addition, studies of peer rejection in 4-to 6-yearolds indicate only modest relations with theory-of-mind performance (Badenes, Estevan, & Bacete, 2000;Slaughter, Dennis, & Pritchard, 2002; but see also Peterson & Siegal, 2002). Similarly, in a longitudinal study of British children who were adopted from Romanian orphanages (Colvert et al, 2008), emotional difficulties at 11 years of age were found to be related to prior deficits in emotion recognition but not to deficits in false belief understanding.…”
Section: Early False Belief Understanding Predicts the Quality Of Latmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…commenting on differences between one's own and another's wishes) during social interactions (Lalonde & Chandler, 1995), possess positive social skills, and vocalize more frequently with peers during play (Watson et al, 1999). They also are less likely to be socially withdrawn (Badenes, Estevan, & Bacete, 2000). Similarly, children's theory of mind and emotion understanding predict their peer likeability (Cassidy, Werner, Rourke, Zubernis, & Balaraman, 2003), and emotion regulation is linked with peer acceptance (Raver, Blackburn, Bancroft, & Torp, 1999).…”
Section: Social Competence and Peer Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Badenes, Estevan, and Bacete (2000) reported a correlation between the ability to deceive others and girls' popularity. This same study indicated that peer-rejected children performed similarly on several theory of mind tasks to children classified sociometrically as average.…”
Section: False Belief and Social Competencementioning
confidence: 99%