2001
DOI: 10.1515/9781400885688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of Linear Poroelasticity with Applications to Geomechanics and Hydrogeology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

27
1,383
2
15

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 816 publications
(1,427 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
27
1,383
2
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Order-of-magnitude calculations based on estimated pore sizes suggest that if the worm were a simple cylindrical biopolymeric hydrogel, hydrostatic pressure would equilibrate over the relatively slow timescales of the experiment (see the Supporting Material); this corresponds to the so-called drained limit in the literature on poroelasticity, and is consistent with the rate-independence of the data (Fig. 4) (40,41). But, if the pressure inside the worm were to equal that on the outside, why should the worm deform at all?…”
Section: Using Hydrostatic Pressure To Probe C Elegans Mechanicssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Order-of-magnitude calculations based on estimated pore sizes suggest that if the worm were a simple cylindrical biopolymeric hydrogel, hydrostatic pressure would equilibrate over the relatively slow timescales of the experiment (see the Supporting Material); this corresponds to the so-called drained limit in the literature on poroelasticity, and is consistent with the rate-independence of the data (Fig. 4) (40,41). But, if the pressure inside the worm were to equal that on the outside, why should the worm deform at all?…”
Section: Using Hydrostatic Pressure To Probe C Elegans Mechanicssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…4 B). The independence of the modulus from the stress rate over the experimentally accessible timescales suggests that the transport of water within the worm's body (and thus equilibration of pressure) is not a limiting factor in the deformation; this is consistent with calculations of the expected timescale for poroelastic effects, t~10 À2 s, suggesting that any hydrodynamic draining occurs very quickly (see the Supporting Material) (40,41).…”
Section: Worms Expand Under Negative Applied Pressuresupporting
confidence: 74%
“…After the plunger is depressed rapidly, the pressure rises rapidly to a high value at the closest gauge but is barely felt further away. Eventually, as water exits the system and progressively more of the load is born by the gel, the pressure at all positions reaches the same value, and the gel relaxes until it reaches an equilibrium where the applied load is everywhere balanced by the elastic stresses in the network [14]. This thought experiment and its variants have been well studied in simple physical gels [15,16], as well as in biogels such as cartilage and collagen networks [11,17].…”
Section: A Minimal Microstructural Model For Cytoplasm: Poroelasticitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…4, the phase lead of water level relative to Earth tides is observable directly in the raw data and not due to cycle skipping. The apparent lack of causality (phase lead) is a result of translating the solution of a diffusion equation in terms of mass increment to a resultant pore pressure (Wang, 2000, Section 6.9). As pointed out by Roeloffs (1996), all aquifers respond as confined systems to very short-period disturbances, and drain to the water table in response to sufficiently long-period disturbances.…”
Section: Permeability Enhancement In the Nearfieldmentioning
confidence: 99%