2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-4-431-53938-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of Hypergeometric Functions

Abstract: concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilm or in any other way, and storage in data banks. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
437
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 254 publications
(451 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
437
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We regard this correspondence as a Q(λ)-linear isomorphism from the trivial vector bundle x∈U H 1 (C • (x), ∂ u ) to Sol(ẋ). For details, refer to [AK,Y2]. 2…”
Section: Proposition 41 Under the Assumption (31) The Stalk Of H mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We regard this correspondence as a Q(λ)-linear isomorphism from the trivial vector bundle x∈U H 1 (C • (x), ∂ u ) to Sol(ẋ). For details, refer to [AK,Y2]. 2…”
Section: Proposition 41 Under the Assumption (31) The Stalk Of H mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we give the monodromy representation and the Pfaffian systems of F D (a, b, c) in terms of the intersection forms of twisted (co)homology groups studied in [AK,CM,Y2]. We characterize circuit transformations and the connection form of the Pfaffian system by vanishing cycles and by vanishing forms for approaches of x to components of the singular locus of the system F D (a, b, c); see Theorems 5.1 and 7.1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the analogous theory of integrals on complex projective spaces [6] one can choose for such a D the "reduced" one, that is, the effective divisor all of whose integral coefficients are equal to one. In our case, however, it is indispensable to choose a non-reduced divisor D = 2[ …”
Section: Proposition 24 We Havementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The twisted de Rham theory developed by Aomoto [1], [3], [6] has brought a unified treatment, and a systematic way of generalization, of various hypergeometric integrals which were invented and investigated by many authors. According to Aomoto, any such integral is interpreted as a pairing of a homology class and a cohomology class on a complex projective space P n minus an effective divisor D with coefficients in a local system of rank one, which is defined by a multi-valued function on P n ramified just along D. Moreover, knowing the structures of the corresponding homology and cohomology groups enables us not only to produce systematically a system of differential equations satisfied by such integrals but also to determine the connection formulae and the monodromy representations of such integrals [2], [4], [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twisted (co)homology groups associated with the integral representation (2) For twisted homology groups, twisted cohomology groups, and the intersection forms, refer to [1,11], or [5]. We use the same notation as in [5] and [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%