1989
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.63.664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of giant magnetoresistance effects in magnetic layered structures with antiferromagnetic coupling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
293
0
7

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 865 publications
(306 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
6
293
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…When spin-flip scattering is caused by spin-orbit interaction in the normal metal, the spin-diffusion length l s f can be estimated to be equal to l f /(␣Z) 2 , where ␣ is the relativistic fine structure constant, Z is the atomic number, and l f is the mean free path ͑see, e.g., Ref. 20͒.…”
Section: B Spin-flip Scattering Spin Relaxationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When spin-flip scattering is caused by spin-orbit interaction in the normal metal, the spin-diffusion length l s f can be estimated to be equal to l f /(␣Z) 2 , where ␣ is the relativistic fine structure constant, Z is the atomic number, and l f is the mean free path ͑see, e.g., Ref. 20͒.…”
Section: B Spin-flip Scattering Spin Relaxationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discovery of the giant magnetoresistance ͑GMR͒ effect in metallic magnetic multilayers 1 has motivated a large number of studies on the transport properties of such systems. 2 The GMR is caused by spin-dependent scattering in the system. Most studies concentrated on collinear configurations ͑parallel and antiparallel configurations͒.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other experimental studies the GMR is studied as a function of the thickness of magnetic and nonmagnetic layers, 8,9 leaving the Co/Cu interfaces unchanged. However, experimental verification of the scattering asymmetry for spin-up and spin-down electrons is usually indirect via fits with models such as the resistor network model, 10 models based on the semiclassical Boltzmann transport equation 11 and the quantum model of Zhang, Levy, and Fert. 12 Due to the large number of input parameters the conclusions obtained are often questionable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As known [14,23], everything else being equal, ρ J 2 ≫ ρ J 1 since the AFM scattering (J 2 < 0) admits a spin-flip processes thereby increasing the scattering amplitude which allows to consider the component ρ J 1 corresponding to the FM exchange prevailing. Since the resistance is proportional to the square of the scattering amplitude which, in turn, according to Eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this structure, only superconductor in the ground normal state may be responsible for negative magnetoresistance at low fields: in accordance with the characteristics of other parts of a contact, copper probes and oxide barriers [12], their magnetoresistance can reveal only slightly increasing behavior in weak magnetic fields. It is known that an increase in conductivity in a magnetic field (except, perhaps, for field values corresponding to large Zeeman energies, capable of, for example, inducing metamagnetism), leading to negative magnetoresistance, indicates either the presence of spin-dependent effects in transport of itinerant conduction electrons [14] or the degradation of weak-localization interference addition to the resistance [15]. Assessing the weak-localization interference correction to the conductivity, we find that the negative contribution to magnetoresistance of the contacts under elastic scattering of electrons (at helium temperatures) due to the destruction of interference self-intersecting trajectories of electrons by a magnetic field in the studied range of fields can be of the following order of magnitude:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%