1978
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(01)83099-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of error for target factor analysis with applications to mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
92
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
92
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Synchrotron-based gXRD and EMPA analyses will complement the current observations to help resolve the formation mechanisms of these Fe-bearing phases. SPOIL function values less than 1.5 are considered excellent, 1.5-3 good, 3-4.5 fair and 4.5-6 poor (Malinowski, 1978). *Best reference spectra based on target transformations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Synchrotron-based gXRD and EMPA analyses will complement the current observations to help resolve the formation mechanisms of these Fe-bearing phases. SPOIL function values less than 1.5 are considered excellent, 1.5-3 good, 3-4.5 fair and 4.5-6 poor (Malinowski, 1978). *Best reference spectra based on target transformations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Target transformations were then performed on the same suite of spectrua used for PCA to evaluate the likelihood that a specific reference spectra exists as an end-member component, as indicated by the SPOIL parameter. SPOIL values less than 1.5 are considered excellent, 1.5-3 good, 3-4.5 fair and 4.5-6 poor (Malinowski, 1978).…”
Section: Micro X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy (Pxas)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of ten Fe-bearing reference compounds was measured. The selection of Fe references for linear combination fit (LCF) analysis was tested by principal component analysis and target transformation testing in the SIX-PACK code (Malinowski, 1978;Webb, 2005). As k-edge (11,867 eV) EXAFS spectra were collected with an energy range of − 200 to 1000 eV in fluorescence mode.…”
Section: Exafs Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…minerals and precipitates used in previous work (Jacquat et al , 2009a, including an additional reference spectrum of wurtzite (Beauchemin et al 2004). The empirical SPOIL value (Malinowski 1978) and the normalized sum of squared residuals (NSSR = (R i (E exp -E fit )…”
Section: Analysis Of Zn K-edge Xanes Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the seven principal components from PCA and target transform testing (TT), potential reference spectra for LCF analysis were identified. The empirical SPOIL value (Malinowski 1978) and the NSSR of the respective target transforms (i.e., deviation between the experimental and the reconstructed spectra) were used to judge the suitability of the references. Results for selected reference spectra are provided in Table 3.…”
Section: Principal Component Analysis and Target Transform Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%