2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-022-5120-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory-driven designed TiO2@MoO2 heterojunction: Balanced crystallinity and nanostructure toward desirable kinetics and high-rate sodium-ion storage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, the contributions of ion diffusion and capacitance to the charge storage are analyzed using the following eqn (1) i ( v ) = av b where b represents the slope, and when the value of b is 1 means that the capacitance plays a dominant role, while the value of b is 0.5 means the diffusion-controlled charge storage. 30 The values of b shown in Fig. 5(b) are all above 0.6, indicating that the charge storage at the NiO/SnO 2 @NG electrode is mainly controlled by the capacitance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Then, the contributions of ion diffusion and capacitance to the charge storage are analyzed using the following eqn (1) i ( v ) = av b where b represents the slope, and when the value of b is 1 means that the capacitance plays a dominant role, while the value of b is 0.5 means the diffusion-controlled charge storage. 30 The values of b shown in Fig. 5(b) are all above 0.6, indicating that the charge storage at the NiO/SnO 2 @NG electrode is mainly controlled by the capacitance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This confirms that the electrochemical behaviors of the MoO 2 @HCNFs and MoO 2 @CNFs are represented by the predominance of the surface capacitive controlled process. To further investigate the pseudocapacitive contribution, Equations (3) and (4) are given [ 38 , 39 ]: i = k 1 v + k 2 v 1/2 i/v 1/2 = k 1 v 1/2 + k 2 where k 1 v is the surface capacitive behaviour and k 2 v 1/2 is the diffusion-controlled behaviour. As shown in Figure 5 c, the pseudocapacitance contribution of the MoO 2 @HCNFs is 75.0% at a scan rate of 1.0 mV s −1 , indicating that the pseudocapacitance behavior accounts for a higher proportion of the overall capacitance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This confirms that the electrochemical behaviors of the MoO 2 @HCNFs and MoO 2 @CNFs are represented by the predominance of the surface capacitive controlled process. To further investigate the pseudocapacitive contribution, Equations ( 3) and ( 4) are given [38,39]:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to MY−LCO and MY@P−LCO, LCO exhibited increased polarization after 50 cycles, undoubtedly affecting the electrochemical reaction kinetics. Subsequently, we calculated the D Li + values for the three materials during discharge using eq S4, 56 as displayed in Figure 5d−f. We observed that after the first cycle, the D Li + values for the three samples were similar.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%