Theory-Based Digital Interventions to Improve Asthma Self-Management Outcomes: Systematic Review

Abstract

BackgroundAsthma is a chronic disease requiring effective self-management to control it and prevent mortality. The use of theory-informed digital interventions promoting asthma self-management is increasing. However, there is limited knowledge concerning how and to what extent psychological theory has been applied to the development of digital interventions, or how using theory impacts outcomes.ObjectiveThe study aimed to examine the use and application of theory in the development of digital interventions to enhance asthma self-management and to evaluate the effectiveness of theory-based interventions in improving adherence, self-management, and clinical outcomes.MethodsElectronic databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO) were searched systematically using predetermined terms. Additional studies were identified by scanning references within relevant studies. Two researchers screened titles and abstracts against predefined inclusion criteria; a third resolved discrepancies. Full-text review was undertaken for relevant studies. Those meeting inclusion criteria were assessed for risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Study outcomes were classified as medication adherence, self-management, asthma control, clinical markers of health, quality of life, other quality of life outcomes, and health care utilization. Effectiveness was calculated as an average outcome score based on the study’s reported significance. The Theory Coding Scheme (TCS) was used to establish the extent to which each intervention had applied theory and which theoretical constructs or behavioral determinants were addressed. Associations between TCS scores and asthma outcomes were described within a narrative synthesis.ResultsFourteen studies evaluating 14 different digital interventions were included in this review. The most commonly cited theories were Social Cognitive Theory, Health Belief Model, and Self-Efficacy Theory. A greater use of theory in the development of interventions was correlated with effective outcomes (r=.657; P=.01): only the 3 studies that met >60% of the different uses of theory assessed by the TCS were effective on all behavioral and clinical outcomes measured. None of the 11 studies that met ≤60% of the TCS criteria were fully effective; however, 3 interventions were partially effective (ie, the intervention had a significant impact on some, but not all, of the outcomes measured). Most studies lacked detail on the theoretical constructs and how they were applied to the development and application of the intervention.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that greater use of theory in the development and application of digital self-management interventions for asthma may increase their effectiveness. The application of theory alone may not be enough to yield a successful intervention, and other factors (eg, the context in which the intervention is used) should be considered. A systemati...

Theoretical asthma self-management program for Taiwanese adolescents with self-efficacy, outcome-expectancy, health behaviour, and asthma symptoms: A randomized controlled trial

“…The findings demonstrated the benefits of an intervention program guided by the self-efficacy model on the health outcomes for patients with chronic diseases [ 35 ]. The results are consistent with a systematic review recommending of using all self-efficacy strategies to optimise the effectiveness of self-management programs for chronic diseases such as asthma [ 10 ]. This study was based on Bandura's self-efficacy model through performance accomplishment, vicarious experience, verbal persuasion, and self-evaluation of physiological and emotional states [ 11 ].…”

“…Evidence showed that self-management programs guided by a theoretical framework provide solid basis and lead to effective outcomes [ 10 ]. Bandura's self-efficacy model includes efficacy-expectation (performance accomplishment, vicarious experience, verbal persuasion, and physiological information) and outcome-expectation (what outcome people expect from engaging in a particular behaviour) [ 11 ].…”

How Do Publicly Available Allergy-Specific Web-Based Training Programs Conform to the Established Criteria for the Reporting, Methods, and Content of Evidence-Based (Digital) Health Information and Education: Thematic Content Evaluation

“…Although the specific learning methods are generally clear, the reasoning behind them and adaptation to specific user groups do not become evident from WTPs’ sections, such as About this course or Aims and objectives . That this is an important shortcoming is shown by previous findings that indicate the effectiveness of asthma self-management interventions with a strong theoretical framework [36]. Apart from an WTP’s theoretical and methodological approaches, its disease-specific contents need to cover all or at least the most relevant and right issues, evident from latest research, medical guidelines, and expert reviews, to be of high quality.…”

Digital technologies for monitoring and improving treatment adherence in children and adolescents with asthma: A scoping review of randomised controlled trials

“…A large, and growing, number of digital technologies have been developed to help support the care and self-management of people with asthma [7][8][9]. Previous systematic reviews have found that digital interventions can help support asthma health management, particularly by improving medication adherence [10,11].…”

“…This is not to be confused with information sources (see first footnote). ‡ The frameworks by Arksey and O'Malley (6) and Levac and colleagues (7) and the JBI guidance (4, 5) refer to the process of data extraction in a scoping review as data charting. § The process of systematically examining research evidence to assess its validity, results, and relevance before using it to inform a decision.…”