2009
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/11/4/043032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory and experimental verification of Kapitza–Dirac–Talbot–Lau interferometry

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
148
1
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
7
148
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…1(a)). This difference was not observed in previous experiments [26,32] because it only shows up in interference patterns recorded with a sufficiently narrow velocity distribution. Recent experiments with improved velocity selection [9] reveal the model discrepancy and provide evidence for the present quantum model.…”
Section: A Talbot-lau Near-field Interferometercontrasting
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…1(a)). This difference was not observed in previous experiments [26,32] because it only shows up in interference patterns recorded with a sufficiently narrow velocity distribution. Recent experiments with improved velocity selection [9] reveal the model discrepancy and provide evidence for the present quantum model.…”
Section: A Talbot-lau Near-field Interferometercontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…Otherwise, the expression (20) applies. We note that this expression resembles an earlier model [26], where photon absorption was implemented as a classical random walk in phase space, disregarding the coherent recoil transfer in a standing wave. Surprisingly, the difference merely amounts to a sign flip ζ coh → −ζ coh in (20), which is equivalent to replacing B j (ξ) with B j (−ξ) = B −j (ξ), as follows from the identity…”
Section: Phase-space Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…8 for the perfluoralkylated nanosphere PFNS8. For smaller molecules with a higher signal-to-noise ratio, such as the fullerenes, Hornberger et al (2009) found that the excellent agreement between theory and experiment permits the determination of α opt with an accu-racy of around ten percent (dominated by the systematic uncertainties in the power and the vertical waist of the diffracting laser). This allows for instance a clear distinction between C 60 and C 70 , directly from the power dependence of their fringe visibility.…”
Section: A Optical Polarizabilitymentioning
confidence: 97%