20th Aerospace Sciences Meeting 1982
DOI: 10.2514/6.1982-232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory and calibration of non-nulling seven-hole cone probes for usein complex flow measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The error analysis of the present calibration procedure did not turn up errors of this magnitude; hence the least-squares polynomial approach (used by Everett et al, 1982) was probably the greatest source of error which could be significantly reduced.…”
Section: Error Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The error analysis of the present calibration procedure did not turn up errors of this magnitude; hence the least-squares polynomial approach (used by Everett et al, 1982) was probably the greatest source of error which could be significantly reduced.…”
Section: Error Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Development of the probe and calibration technique is described by Gallington (1980). Further refinements of the same basic technique are presented by Everett et al (1982Everett et al ( , 1983, and Gerner and Maurer (1982). Contained in this report is a thorough examination of seven-hole probe calibration theory and the factors which govern the use of seven-hole probes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Highly sophisticated studies of multi-hole probe calibration techniques and high-angle flow measurement have been presented by Gerner et al (1984) and Everett et al (1982Everett et al ( , 1983, dealing with conical 7-hole probes characterized by small dimensions and the capability of flow angle measurements up to 70 ~ . These probes were used in a non-nulling mode for the determination of flow angle and velocity to within an error of 2.0 ~ and Mach number to within 0.04 with 95% certainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a 7-hole probe represents a certain amount of unavoidable additional efforts concerning fabrication, calibration and measuring setup in comparison to 5-and 4-hole probes. Ostowari and Wentz (1983) adapted the extended calibration technique presented by Everett et al (1982) to a conical 5-hole probe in order to permit a useful angle measurement range of _+ 85 ~ without the additional cost and effort of a 7-hole probe. Their modified technique is based on two different sets of calibration functions, defined for both, low flow angles and high flow angles, separately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach allows for region-specific coefficient definitions and extends the angular range of the probe. Gerner and Maurer, 9 Gerner and Sisson, 10 and Everett et al 2,11 used seven-hole probes and split the angular domain into low-angle and high-angle flows (by methods similar to those used by Bryer and Pankhurst 1 ) and extended the usable angular range up to 70 deg in cone angle (angle between the velocity vector and the probe axis). Based on the work by Gerner and Maurer, 9 Ostowari and Wentz 12 extended the angular range of a conical five-hole probe to 85 deg.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%