2004
DOI: 10.1021/cr030409h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory and Applications of NMR-Based Screening in Pharmaceutical Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
190
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 298 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
1
190
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative STD effect was calculated for each signal as the difference between the intensity (expressed as S/N ratio) of one signal in the on-resonance STD spectrum and that of the same signal in the off-resonance NMR spectrum divided by the intensity of the same signal in the offresonance spectrum. BMI values were obtained by using Equation (1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relative STD effect was calculated for each signal as the difference between the intensity (expressed as S/N ratio) of one signal in the on-resonance STD spectrum and that of the same signal in the off-resonance NMR spectrum divided by the intensity of the same signal in the offresonance spectrum. BMI values were obtained by using Equation (1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] In particular, saturation transfer difference (STD) spectroscopy [2] offers several advantages: a modest requirement of an unlabeled biological target, virtually without upper limits on its size; amenability to screening mixtures of putative ligands in the presence of non-ligands, molecules that target viruses, [3] and membrane-bound receptors on living cells; [4] and rapid access to relevant information on ligand epitope maps. [5] A main limitation, common to all ligand-based approaches for NMR screening, is that no direct information can be gathered on the intervening receptor surface, and therefore on the mode and site of binding, even if an indirect method (SOS-NMR; SOS: structural information using Overhauser effects and selective labeling) based on selective protein labeling has been devised.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pulse sequences of this type have the advantage that they do not cause sample heating, attenuate protein signals, cause metabolite protein-mediated saturations or suppress signals from exchangeable protons, all of which are common problems with otherwise robust saturation-based approaches. These pulse sequences are very popular and have been used in fields such as food analysis, 4 metabo(l/n)omics, 5,6 drug discovery, 7 and environmental studies. 8 Within this class, sequences that use the excitation sculpting principle 9 are particularly efficient.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the major disadvantages of this technique is that the protein must be stable over the long data acquisition process. [37] Wang et al screened a 10,000-member custom made fragment library against 15 N-labelled BACE-1, a target currently thought to be important for the treatment of Alzheimers disease, using HSQC NMR. [38] They identified a thiourea fragment with a K d of 550 µM, which was rapidly optimised using a combination of HSQC NMR and a functional assay to improve affinity by a factor of 36, to give a K d of 15 µM.…”
Section: Challenges For Fbdd: Fragment Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%