2003
DOI: 10.1080/1063073032000139705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory and application of urban governance: The case of Seoul

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such urban redevelopment processes in South Korea are an example of Molotch's (1976) growth machine framework where profit-seeking residents are involved in and collaborate with a private construction company. Furthermore, Lee (2000Lee ( , 2003 points to the dominating influence of Seoul's urban regime on authoritarian administration, unjust distribution of resources, and a top-down planning approach to urban economic development. Top-down superficial governance, in this context, represents growth coalitions of central governments and large capitalist groups without decentralization and empowerment (Kim 2010, p. 300).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such urban redevelopment processes in South Korea are an example of Molotch's (1976) growth machine framework where profit-seeking residents are involved in and collaborate with a private construction company. Furthermore, Lee (2000Lee ( , 2003 points to the dominating influence of Seoul's urban regime on authoritarian administration, unjust distribution of resources, and a top-down planning approach to urban economic development. Top-down superficial governance, in this context, represents growth coalitions of central governments and large capitalist groups without decentralization and empowerment (Kim 2010, p. 300).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such reflections profoundly align with Bulkeley's discourse on urban sustainability, wherein environmental priorities are woven intrinsically into the urban fabric (Bulkeley, 2006). Moreover, the contours of these reflections are further sharpened when viewed through the lens of the socio-technical systems theory, emphasising the symbiotic fusion of societal mores and technological progression (Bijker et al, 1994;Sepehr, 2024). A recurrent leitmotif from the expert dialogues was the unmistakable emphasis on collaborative paradigms, championing integrative partnerships across diverse sectors.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In a democratic society, an integrated urban development replaces technocratic planning approaches (Lee 2003;Hassan 2011;Coelho 2021). Urban development theories of the XXI century privilege people and their human experience as the central driver for ideal place concepts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%