1997
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880070203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory and application of static field inhomogeneity effects in gradient‐echo imaging

Abstract: The influence of local static magnetic field inhomogeneities on gradient-echo imaging is discussed and the underlying theoretical aspects are reviewed. A high-resolution approach is suggested to suppress image distortion and restore signal loss due to spin dephasing. Acquisition of three-dimensional data sets not only overcomes part of the limitations associated with gradient echoes but also makes it possible to extract local information about the strength or direction of background gradients and relative susc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
232
0
3

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 259 publications
(240 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
232
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For most configurations, it will create local magnetic fields that vary spatially outside of its inner core, leading to signal dephasing. Irrespective of the diamagnetic or paramagnetic property of the sources, changes in the local magnetic field lead to spatial variations in phase outside the source, and therefore, to the dephasing of the signal and a reduction in T2* [18] . The amount of dephasing does not depend on whether the material is paramagnetic or diamagnetic, but on the field variations across a voxel.…”
Section: Basic Principles Of Swi Swi Is Often Superior Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For most configurations, it will create local magnetic fields that vary spatially outside of its inner core, leading to signal dephasing. Irrespective of the diamagnetic or paramagnetic property of the sources, changes in the local magnetic field lead to spatial variations in phase outside the source, and therefore, to the dephasing of the signal and a reduction in T2* [18] . The amount of dephasing does not depend on whether the material is paramagnetic or diamagnetic, but on the field variations across a voxel.…”
Section: Basic Principles Of Swi Swi Is Often Superior Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enhance the visibility of the venous structures, the magnitude images were multiplied four times with a phase mask generated from the filtered phase data (22). This postprocessing was automatically done by a modified version of the spectrometer software in 33 cases.…”
Section: Clinical Imaging Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, phase images can enhance contrast to local changes in magnetic susceptibility, therefore, yielding increased sensitivity in detecting local changes in iron content. [24][25][26] Nonheme iron, usually in the form of ferritin, is a highly paramagnetic molecule, which causes a phase shift in the local field correlated with the amount of iron deposition. 25,27 We believe that SWI would be a very sensitive imaging sequence, better elaborating putative iron distribution or extent in the deep gray nuclei of patients with MSA-P and IPD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%