1980
DOI: 10.1016/0165-232x(80)90003-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory and application of ground freezing in civil engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to an extensive study on hysteresis models for SWCCs , however, the measurement of a complete set of hysteretic curves is time consuming and costly, and the choice and mathematical formulation of an adequate hysteresis model, including calibration of the parameters, would require additional considerations beyond the scope of this paper. Because for geotechnical applications of the soil freezing method, for example, in tunneling, the performance of the soil during the freezing phase is generally the relevant aspect for the design of the support measures (see, e.g., ), hysteresis effects are disregarded in this paper.…”
Section: Constitutive Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to an extensive study on hysteresis models for SWCCs , however, the measurement of a complete set of hysteretic curves is time consuming and costly, and the choice and mathematical formulation of an adequate hysteresis model, including calibration of the parameters, would require additional considerations beyond the scope of this paper. Because for geotechnical applications of the soil freezing method, for example, in tunneling, the performance of the soil during the freezing phase is generally the relevant aspect for the design of the support measures (see, e.g., ), hysteresis effects are disregarded in this paper.…”
Section: Constitutive Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may lead either to the development of a freezing pressure or the flow of displaced water to surrounding zones without significant pressure development. According to Jessberger [1], freezing pressures between 0.1 and 1.0 MPa can be expected. For the design cross section QS4 a maximum freezing pressure of 0.35 MPa was assumed, based on the hydrological conditions described in the geotechnical report (kvalues ≤ 5 · 10 -4 to ≤ 1 · 10 -4 m/s).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…von den vorliegenden Durchlässigkeiten und der pro Zeiteinheit gefrorenen Wassermenge abhängig. Nach Jessberger [1] kann der resultierende Eisdruck zwischen 0,1 und 1,0 MPa variieren. Dem Bemessungsquerschnitt QS4, der hier behandelt wird, wurde auf Grundlage des geotechnischen Bodengutachtens und der darin beschriebenen hydrologischen Verhältnisse (k-Werte ≤ 5 · 10 -4 bis ≤ 1 · 10 -4 m/s) ein maximaler Eisdruck von 0,35 MPa zugrunde gelegt.…”
Section: Berechnungunclassified
“…where C w represents the hydrothermal capacity; C eq denotes the equivalent volume heat capacity (kJ/(m 3 If the porosity of soil is θ s and the content of water and ice in the pores is θ w and θ i , respectively, then…”
Section: Test Equipment and Similarity Eorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Freezing technology is a construction technique that sends refrigerant into the stratum to form an impervious structure by freezing the water [1]. Because of its adaptability to complex stratum, good water-sealing ability, no pollution, technical maturity, and reliability, it has been widely used in construction [2][3][4][5]. e effects of different factors such as seepage velocity, distance between freezing pipes, refrigerant temperature, and diameter of the frozen pipe were studied by Zhou et al [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%