“…While this policy was considered during the 1980s among education circles in the United States as an intrusive step taken by the state (see, e.g., the position of the American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education [AACTE] Task Force on Teacher Certification [1984] and alternative routes, as published in the Journal of Teacher Education), the media seems to have silenced the fierce conflict around this policy. Indeed, as can be seen in table 2, the "alternate route," which was successfully implemented by the state after a bitter battle between state officials and teacher educators (Carlson et al 1983;Tamir 2008Tamir , 2010, appeared in stories that were framed more than other policies around thematic reasoning (x 2 (1, N p 174) p 4.76, p p .029) and lack of conflict, creating a somewhat unreal image to the "alternate route" policy, as if it passed with no substantial opposition. Social agents who vehemently opposed these policies, like teacher educators, were given minimal space in the news to argue or bring data that could challenge the state's perspective (chi-square test confirms this contention, showing that teacher educators who were the prime target of this policy tended to appear in stories featuring "alternate route" [as the main policy] at the same low rate they appeared in other stories).…”