2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11186-021-09442-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theorizing disaster communitas

Abstract: Disaster scholars have long complained that their field is theory light: they are much better at doing and saying than analyzing. The paucity of theory doubtless reflects an understandable focus on case studies and practical solutions. Yet this works against big picture thinking. Consequently, both our comprehension of social suffering and our ability to mitigate it are fragmented. Communitas is exemplary here. This refers to the improvisational acts of mutual help, collective feeling and utopian desires that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increases in symptoms of psychological stress following the initial response associated with cohabitation with the care recipient and low levels of support from friend and family networks are particularly relevant to pandemic restrictions, in which caregivers may be particularly isolated in their caregiving role. Capitalising on normally available supports and a sense of communitas observed to emerge during disaster events ( Matthewman & Uekusa, 2021 ), future pandemic responses may meaningfully support caregivers by making explicit provisions for and facilitating safe extensions of household ‘bubbles’ to include others who may normally or may be enabled during periods of restrictions on work or other responsibilities to provide help (e.g. via testing, advice on suitable periods and protocols for isolation of linked households, and supply and advice on use of personal protective equipment such as masks and hand sanitiser).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Increases in symptoms of psychological stress following the initial response associated with cohabitation with the care recipient and low levels of support from friend and family networks are particularly relevant to pandemic restrictions, in which caregivers may be particularly isolated in their caregiving role. Capitalising on normally available supports and a sense of communitas observed to emerge during disaster events ( Matthewman & Uekusa, 2021 ), future pandemic responses may meaningfully support caregivers by making explicit provisions for and facilitating safe extensions of household ‘bubbles’ to include others who may normally or may be enabled during periods of restrictions on work or other responsibilities to provide help (e.g. via testing, advice on suitable periods and protocols for isolation of linked households, and supply and advice on use of personal protective equipment such as masks and hand sanitiser).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Gibson et al, 2018 ; O’Sullivan et al, 2018 ; Uekusa, 2019 ; Wakui et al, 2017 ). Further, fuelled with community altruism ( Solnit, 2010 ) and emerging sense of disaster communitas ( Matthewman & Uekusa, 2021 ), emergent and existing community groups often reach out to groups perceived as being vulnerable following disasters and attempt to fill the gaps in social and health services. This community response was evident during the early months of the pandemic response in New Zealand (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pandemic Solidarity is an important reminder that while the aid industry at large has not paid much attention to the scale and importance of mutual aid, others have been more open to recognising and valuing such expressions of local agency. Although preferring the term ‘communitas', Matthewman and Uekusa ( 2021 ) offer a particularly helpful introduction to and reflection on current literature related to what we refer to here as ‘mutual aid'.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In several cases, the latter were able to build on and take advantage of the experience harnessed by mutual aid and other grassroots initiatives as their more institutionalised responses gathered speed. As Matthewman and Uekusa ( 2021 , p. 14) concluded in their paper: ‘community groups often succeed where governments fail'. The potential, therefore, for communitas to ‘build back better’ means that it should be enhanced.…”
Section: Key Findings and Suggestions To Inform Future Programming By Aid Actorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation