2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2014.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theories of intelligence and students' daily self-handicapping behaviors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
27
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It does so because it shows in an ecologically valid setting, and through a longitudinal research design, that (self-reported) study regulation -and not only beliefs about the nature of effort (see Blackwell et al, 2007) or effort attributions (Hong et al, 1999) -relate to decreased study efforts and increased homework procrastination. In fact, these results fully align with a recent diary study which has shown that entity beliefs predicted lower mean levels of study efforts and higher mean levels of procrastination (Rickert, Meras, & Witkow, 2014). Apparently, a student who believes that his or her ability is fixed is more susceptible to question the usefulness of effort and hard work to attain a goal.…”
Section: Implicit Theoriessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…It does so because it shows in an ecologically valid setting, and through a longitudinal research design, that (self-reported) study regulation -and not only beliefs about the nature of effort (see Blackwell et al, 2007) or effort attributions (Hong et al, 1999) -relate to decreased study efforts and increased homework procrastination. In fact, these results fully align with a recent diary study which has shown that entity beliefs predicted lower mean levels of study efforts and higher mean levels of procrastination (Rickert, Meras, & Witkow, 2014). Apparently, a student who believes that his or her ability is fixed is more susceptible to question the usefulness of effort and hard work to attain a goal.…”
Section: Implicit Theoriessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Despite the wealth of empirical testing that has been devoted to understanding graduate performance, only a few variables seem to be reasonable predictors of academic performance. Demographic and psychosocial variables are at best small predictors of student performance and scores on secondary education standardised tests or A-levels are at best moderate predictors of tertiary academic performance (Richardson et al, 2012). The non-intellective constructs that Richardson et al, found that predicted GPA (modestly), were self-efficacy (one's belief in one's ability to succeed in specific situations or accomplish a task), effort regulation and grade goal.…”
Section: Measure What You Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent to which GPA is a useful barometer for students advancing learning is however, debatable. Recent systematic reviews show the range of effects of GPA as indicators of performance vary from small (Richardson, Abraham, & Bond, 2012) to moderate (Schneider & Preckel, 2017). However, derived prior performance is suggested to aid future performance in a reciprocal way because it draws on knowledge (prior achievement and intelligence) and strategies (self-efficacy and goal-directed use of learning strategies) (Schneider & Preckel, 2017).…”
Section: Measure What You Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In an academic situation, self-handicapping is demonstrated in different forms such as alcohol and drug abuse, procrastination and failure to complete assignments, lack of studying lessons, lack of attention in the classroom and non-preparation for exams [12,[15][16][17][18][19], positive attitude toward cheating and acting it [20]. In contrast, self-efficacy is the opposite of self-handicapping and refers to individuals' beliefs about their own capabilities to do a certain level of performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%