1990
DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(90)90270-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theories of inflation and conformal transformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This "shearing" of the vacuum energy to both pursuits is the cause of a moderate power law inflation instead of an exponential one [40]. In this scenario the Universe begins with a contraction, and therefore the same shearing mechanism, moreover here due to the Higgs field, drives a "friction" process for the contraction, due to the varying of G(χ), making the deflation era always weaker.…”
Section: Initial Conditions and Inflationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This "shearing" of the vacuum energy to both pursuits is the cause of a moderate power law inflation instead of an exponential one [40]. In this scenario the Universe begins with a contraction, and therefore the same shearing mechanism, moreover here due to the Higgs field, drives a "friction" process for the contraction, due to the varying of G(χ), making the deflation era always weaker.…”
Section: Initial Conditions and Inflationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main ingredient of this mechanism has been observed in string cosmology earlier in [20,21]. In the backgrounds dominated by conformal matter where T µ µ = 0 the source terms arising from the gravitational couplings of the moduli to matter vanish and moduli are quickly kinetically damped [22,23]. Their energy density dilutes as ρ h ∼ 1/a 6 for the homogeneous mode or as ρ i ∼ 1/a 4 for inhomogeneities [24], where a is the cosmological scale factor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the universe evolves undergoing cosmic expansion, the energy density of the black hole gas will change in two ways: i) it will redshift away according to the usual ∼ 1/a 3 law for massive particles, since we are ignoring the black hole interactions (we expect that this is justified for heavy black holes when they are sufficiently separated [37]) and ii) the evolution of the modulus will change the coupling and so the mass of the black holes, as is clear from (4). When the evolution is smooth, a good approximation accounting for these two effects is to represent the energy density as a function of the scale factor and the modulus vev as [22,23] ρ BH =n 0 M P l a 0 a 3 q e g 2 κφ/2 + p e −g 2 κφ/2 ,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This argument opens up new possibilities that one can constrain a broad class of inflation models from the reheating temperature. Reheating in Starobinsky's R 2 inflation has been considered by [16,19].Interactions between φ and matter stem from a mixing between metric and scalar field perturbations through f (φ)R [6]. It is this "gravitational decay channel" from φ to matter that makes the universe reheat after inflation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%