2003
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.389044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theories of Diversity within Organisation Studies: Debates and Future Trajectories

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More field studies are needed in order to provide insight into the complexity of diversity in organizations. Being in line with Janssens and Steyaert (2003), future research may benefit from understanding diversity as a mosaic of differences, where all differences are interrelated, and where differences are continuously produced and reproduced through the social embeddedness. Diversity and difference are not given, but are produced within a network of relations that are situated in a social context.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…More field studies are needed in order to provide insight into the complexity of diversity in organizations. Being in line with Janssens and Steyaert (2003), future research may benefit from understanding diversity as a mosaic of differences, where all differences are interrelated, and where differences are continuously produced and reproduced through the social embeddedness. Diversity and difference are not given, but are produced within a network of relations that are situated in a social context.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Such progressive alternatives need to recognize the historical, structural and group-based nature of inequality (Konrad, 2003;Linnehan and Konrad, 1999), help empower the collective voice of employees and avoid essentializing difference without emptying its content (Lorbiecki and Jack, 2000;Swan, 2010;Zanoni and Janssens, 2004). Therefore, developing policy and research frameworks which are based on an intersectional conception of inequality (Holvino, 2010;Janssens and Steyaert, 2003;Nkomo, 1992) is essential.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This development is clearly not the same for each and every individual. It is determined by certain aspects of the job design (physical and mental demands), the work process, and the employment relationship, as well as by factors outside the direct work context such as policy with regard to older workers and the course of a (working) life (Gould et al, 2008;Janssens & Steyaert, 2003;Pruijt, 1997;Sennett, 2008). It also depends on special events such as periods of unemployment or migration.…”
Section: Theoretical Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%