2006
DOI: 10.4324/9781410615299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theories in Second Language Acquisition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
101
0
8

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
101
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…This view is well supported by the aforementioned research showing that learners can come to know aspects of the target language which they have not been explicitly taught, as well as the well accepted generalisation that much of second language acquisition happens incidentally (VanPatten and Williams 2007). A functional view sees real language as more meaningful and thus more likely to lead to genuine engagement, a point which the cognitive linguists make much of, as engagement leads to more processing and concurrent development of knowledge.…”
Section: Authenticmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…This view is well supported by the aforementioned research showing that learners can come to know aspects of the target language which they have not been explicitly taught, as well as the well accepted generalisation that much of second language acquisition happens incidentally (VanPatten and Williams 2007). A functional view sees real language as more meaningful and thus more likely to lead to genuine engagement, a point which the cognitive linguists make much of, as engagement leads to more processing and concurrent development of knowledge.…”
Section: Authenticmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Indeed, national standardization efforts in teacher education exist virtually everywhere across the globe (For a review see, Darling-Hammond & Brenson, 2005). In light of our analyses of the curriculum and the TESOL/NCATE standards, ELTE programs in Turkey seem to lack: (1) a conceptual framework that is comprehensive, current, and consistent with SLA and L2 teacher education research (Bartels, 2005;Borg, 2006;Burns & Richards, 2009;Ellis, 2012;Nation & Macalister, 2010;Tredick, 2004); (2) a curriculum that is designed by the faculty to meet the specific needs of teacher candidates; (3) a focus on competency in language and SLA (Gass & Selinker, 2008;VanPatten & Williams, 2007) and culture (Gay, 2010;Johnson, 2009) domains; (4) content on instructional methods that meet the needs of teacher candidates, as evident in the critical accounts of the directors and the teacher candidates (Larsen-Freeman, 2003;Kumaravadivelu, 2006;Richards & Rodgers, 2001); and, (5) content on L2 testing (Fulcher & Davidson, 2006;Hughes, 2003), which is markedly ignored. Most importantly (6), however, if these programs are to be held accountable to deliver the same quality of instruction and practicum experiences, HEC must follow a more equitable and just approach in the appointments of faculty with relevant background in the field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Krashen has never openly stated this, many in the field believe that his theory is based on Chomsky's theory of language (e.g., Gass & Selinker, 2001;Larsen-Freeman & Long, 1991;VanPatten & Williams, 2007b). The connection between the two theories lies in their shared belief that humans possess a unique innate ability to learn languages-Chomsky's "the language acquisition device".…”
Section: Nativism/innatismmentioning
confidence: 99%