Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1986
DOI: 10.1086/284611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theories and Models of Species Abundance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
128
1
5

Year Published

1991
1991
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
128
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, these results agree with the findings of Hanski et al (1993), which stated that the number of core species will decrease with aggregated individuals as compared to a random distribution, whereas Goodall's (1952) prediction of an increasing number of satellite species could not be confirmed. In our investigation, the total number of species sampled remained generally constant with an increasing degree of aggregation, which does not agree with Goodall (1952) and Hughes (1986), who predicted a decrease in species number. However, the size of the sample unit seems to have a greater impact on the shape of the occupancy distribution than the degree of aggregation (Fig.…”
Section: Intraspecific Aggregation Of Individualscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, these results agree with the findings of Hanski et al (1993), which stated that the number of core species will decrease with aggregated individuals as compared to a random distribution, whereas Goodall's (1952) prediction of an increasing number of satellite species could not be confirmed. In our investigation, the total number of species sampled remained generally constant with an increasing degree of aggregation, which does not agree with Goodall (1952) and Hughes (1986), who predicted a decrease in species number. However, the size of the sample unit seems to have a greater impact on the shape of the occupancy distribution than the degree of aggregation (Fig.…”
Section: Intraspecific Aggregation Of Individualscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Although this study does not focus on singletons, but instead on relative measures of rare species, the conclusions drawn here are congruent with those of the above-mentioned previous research. It is possible that differences between tropical and non-tropical regions (which also show continental differences in this study) are the result of lower absolute densities of several tropical species (Schoener 1987, Price et al 1995, Ulrich 2001a, or that the higher frequency of rarity in the tropics may depend on different patterns of resource distribution and niche apportionment in snake communities (Hughes 1986, Tokeshi 1990, Bersier and Sugihara 1997, Kunin and Gaston 1997, Moulliot et al 2000, Novotny and Basset 2000, Ulrich 2001b, Johansson et al 2006. However, as the operational definition of rarity used in this paper (as well as in many equivalent studies) may influence the frequency results, it may also influence the latitudinal gradient and continental differences we detected because these differences are strongly connected with differences in total species richness.…”
Section: Broad Patterns Of Rarity In Snakesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In the last 70 years, a series of studies have been developed aiming to understand this pattern and to generate models that reflect the species abundance distributions empirically observed (Motomura, 1932;Fisher et al, 1943;Preston, 1948;MacArthur, 1957;1960;Preston, 1962a;1962b;Caswell, 1976;Sugihara, 1980;Hughes, 1986;Tokeshi 1990;Bell, 2000;Hubbell, 2001). The initial hope of finding a mathematical model that closely fits observed data based on well established ecological and statistical theory and amenable to further tests and experiments has proved to be a difficult task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%