Theorie Der Produktion

Schneider, Erich

doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-5312-3

Cited by 68 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…22 Frisch (1965) does not make any reference to von Stackelberg. However, he presumably knows von Stackelberg's results from the texts of Carlson (1939) and Schneider (1934Schneider ( , 1972Schneider ( [1949) from which he quotes on several occasions. 23 Economies of scale can be captured in a multi-output setting by considering the two related concepts of ray economies of scale (Baumol 1977, Panzar andWillig 1977b) and product-speci c economies of scale (Panzar and Willig 1977a).…”

Section: Notesmentioning

confidence: 95%

“…Indeed, the second part of the conclusion has sometimes been ignored. One early example is the in uential textbook on production theory by Erich Schneider (1934), one of the cofounders of the Econometric Society. In this text he does not give any treatment at all to the issue of joint production, which is justi ed by a reference to von Stackelberg's work (Schneider 1934: iii).…”

Section: Programmatic (Mis)interpretationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Heinrich von Stackelberg on joint production

Baumgärtner¹

2001

The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the 1970s, considerable interest arose into the study of multi-output firms and industries. However, this literature did not seem to be aware of the contribution that von Stackelberg made to the issue almost half a century earlier. This paper outlines von Stackelberg's contribution to the theory of costs under joint production. It critically assesses the place of his contribution in the modern history of the theory of joint production and it suggests an answer to the question of why von Stackelberg's theory of joint production fell into oblivion and even contributed to the abandonment of the issue for decades.Cost Theory Heinrich Von Stackelberg Joint Production Theory Of The Firm,

show abstract

Section: Notesmentioning

confidence: 95%

Section: Programmatic (Mis)interpretationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Heinrich von Stackelberg on joint production

Baumgärtner¹

2001

The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Apart from a rather brief article in Econometrica (Jantzen, 1948), his works were in Danish, which obviously put the brakes on his international acceptance. Erich Schneider (1934, 1938) presented his thinking to the German profession, while Brems (1952, 1964) carried Jantzen's pioneering efforts to the economic profession in general.…”

Section: Early Danish Microeconomic Contributionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

From price theory to marketing management: Danish contributions 1930‐1960

Madsen

Pedersen²

2013

Jnl of Hist Res in Mrkting

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe purpose of this article is to show how a particular marketing paradigm developed in Denmark from the 1920s through to the 1960s. It peaked in the mid‐1950s and faded out with one major publication in the early 1970s. This article aims to provide a relatively detailed study of the initial phases of the school and its key ideas.Design/methodology/approachThe study is based on primary sources, i.e. the writings of the scholars who shaped and developed the school. A significant number of the sources are available in Danish only.FindingsWhile the study of marketing in America developed from the inductive, descriptive approach of the German Historical School, an essential precondition for the Copenhagen approach was the second wave of microeconomic theory of the 1930s. The article argues that it was a marketing management school, and that it offered early contributions to the development of marketing theory.Originality/valueRelatively little has been written about Danish and Scandinavian history of marketing thought. The authors believe that a detailed review of the Copenhagen School of Marketing may be of some interest to marketing historians around the world.

show abstract

“…21n neoclassical models a change of technique is always obtainable with a continuous variation (or a variation that in the limit becomes continuous when there are infinitely many techniques) in any one coefficient at a time: this hypothesis can be found either in the earlier versions of marginal theory, where technology was represented by continuous, differentiable, concave production functions (see Wicksteed, 1894;Schneider, 1934), or in the modern formulations of general equilibrium models, where technology is described in terms of closed, bounded and convex "production sets". Recently aggregate production functions have enjoyed great favour in basic models of modern neoclassical macroeconomics (see Blanchard and Fisher, 1989, Chapters 2, 3 and 7), notwithstanding that the logical inconsistency of this tool has been demonstrated (see Garegnani, 1970).…”

Section: Introduction and Definitionsmentioning

confidence: 98%

Continuous Switching of Techniques in Linear Production Models

Bellino

1993

The Manchester School

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Theorie Der Produktion

Cited by 68 publications

References 0 publications

Heinrich von Stackelberg on joint production

Heinrich von Stackelberg on joint production

From price theory to marketing management: Danish contributions 1930‐1960

Continuous Switching of Techniques in Linear Production Models

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About