2011
DOI: 10.7748/nr2011.01.18.2.39.c8283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical versus pragmatic design in qualitative research

Abstract: Theoretical versus pragmatic design challenges in qualitative research. Nurse Researcher, 18 (2): 39-51 Acknowledgements:We wish to thank M Donovan-Hall, School of Health Professional and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Southampton for her contribution to the development of figure 1 which depicts the relationship between qualitative and quantitative methods of analysis. Key Words:Qualitative research, framework analysis, parent's experiences, hydrocephalus AbstractThe relative merits of adopting a gener… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
72
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…74 The research team comprised three nurse researchers, all of whom were aware of their own potential impact on the study. To ensure rigour, the following steps were taken: preconceived beliefs were acknowledged prior to data collection; each researcher used a reflective log to record their own thoughts; researcher understandings were checked with participants at the end of each episode of data collection; and analysis was conducted independently and then as a team.…”
Section: Health Economic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…74 The research team comprised three nurse researchers, all of whom were aware of their own potential impact on the study. To ensure rigour, the following steps were taken: preconceived beliefs were acknowledged prior to data collection; each researcher used a reflective log to record their own thoughts; researcher understandings were checked with participants at the end of each episode of data collection; and analysis was conducted independently and then as a team.…”
Section: Health Economic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,2] It covers a broad range of approaches with a wide variation in concepts, assumptions and analytic rules. Despite this variation all qualitative methodologies contribute to description and interpretation of complex phenomena, developing and revising understanding, rather than purely verifying earlier conclusions of theories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some researchers believe that the application of qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis is suitable for those who want to employ a lower level of inference interpretation, rather than a more abstract interpretation. [2,8] In other words, they focus on the explicit description of the content of communication with a limited reflection on its implicit meaning. [9,10] 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This qualitative study adopted a pragmatic research design (Sandelowski 2000, Smith, Bekker, andCheater 2011), that is, a design that allowed the study questions to be addressed from multiple and diverse views and interpretations, to explore the perceptions and experiences of OT and SP students and allied health academics -one rurally based at the BHUDRH with direct responsibility for student supervision and one metropolitan based with a strategic program role -who were engaged in the development and delivery of the program. Study questions explored:…”
Section: The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researchers had a desire to avoid over-immersion in the epistemological underpinnings of a chosen method that poorly aligned to the complex and multi-dimensional aims of the study (Sandelowski 2000, Smith, Bekker, andCheater 2011).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%