2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-1665-0_58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical Validation of New Class Cohesion Metric Against Briand Properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CC metric satisfy necessary properties for class cohesion and comparison with other existing metrics given in Table II also described by [22]. The results show that CC metric satisfies all the properties given by Briand et al [11].…”
Section: Theoretical Validation Of Proposed Cohesion Metricssupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CC metric satisfy necessary properties for class cohesion and comparison with other existing metrics given in Table II also described by [22]. The results show that CC metric satisfies all the properties given by Briand et al [11].…”
Section: Theoretical Validation Of Proposed Cohesion Metricssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The metric CC proposed for measuring cohesion of a class that satisfies the following two requirements, viz., first, it gives values that can be uniquely interpreted in terms of cohesion, and, second, the values would be within a range of 0 to 1. The value 0 would signify minimum cohesion and 1 the maximum cohesion [22]. To evaluate CC, first calculate Cohesion Value of a global variable i th of a class (CV i ).…”
Section: Proposed Cohesion Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mal et al [4] proposed class cohesion (CC) metric and empirically validated against the open source software projects to found the effective quality factors. Their study concluded that CC continuously gave better correlation with Number Line of Code (NLOC) compared to other existing cohesion metrics.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We identify the error‐proneness by computing the cohesion values of the nodes. Through empirical studies, many researchers have validated that modules having low cohesion and high coupling values are more prone to errors. Thus, test cases executing such nodes have a high chance of detecting faults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%