2020
DOI: 10.1039/c9cp06824d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical understanding of the electrochemical reaction barrier: a kinetic study of CO2reduction reaction on copper electrodes

Abstract: The electrochemical reduction of CO2 is a promising route for converting intermittent renewable energy into storable fuels and useful chemical products.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on Marcus charge transfer theory, the activation energy is calculated by reorganization energy and Gibbs free‐energy change as Equation (3). Under the equilibrium potential (the Gibbs free‐energy change equals 0), the activation energy is only determined by the reorganization energy of the reactants ( λ R ) and the reorganization energy of the products ( λ P ) [40,45–47] . We draw the contour map of activation barrier as a function of λ R and λ P at equilibrium potential.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on Marcus charge transfer theory, the activation energy is calculated by reorganization energy and Gibbs free‐energy change as Equation (3). Under the equilibrium potential (the Gibbs free‐energy change equals 0), the activation energy is only determined by the reorganization energy of the reactants ( λ R ) and the reorganization energy of the products ( λ P ) [40,45–47] . We draw the contour map of activation barrier as a function of λ R and λ P at equilibrium potential.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A displaced‐distorted oscillator model based on classic Marcus theory is proposed to calculate the activation barrier of a concerted proton–electron transfer process, which is expressed as the following Equation : [45–47] trueEa=(-λnormalR+λnormalRλnormalP[]λR+ΔG()λnormalRλnormalP-1λRλP-1)2 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Diverse products were investigated from the reduction of CO 2 , as methanol, ethanol, and acetone, but just methanol was identified and quantified in all reactions. Before the discussion of the results, it is important to mention that some recent studies have showed that the rate of methanol production is largely dependent on the electrocatalytic activity of deposited copper crystal surfaces, and it increases in the following order, Cu(111) < Cu(100) < Cu(110) < Cu(211) [65]. This difference in electrocatalytic activity is attributed to the surface and solvation effects that directly influence on the activation barriers for the electrochemical charge transfer and the reaction driving force (Gibbs energy).…”
Section: Photoelectrocatalytic Reduction Of Co 2 On Nt/tio 2 With Copper Oxidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Cu 2 O nanoparticles exhibit octahedral shape and expose more photoactive surfaces, the (111) crystal facet has low faradaic efficiency performance on the formation of radical intermediates that leads methanol production when compared with CuO (110) surfaces, which are in majority in NT/TiO 2 -CuO (lactic acid) (Fig. 4) [65].…”
Section: Photoelectrocatalytic Reduction Of Co 2 On Nt/tio 2 With Copper Oxidesmentioning
confidence: 99%