2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1365-1609(02)00010-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical treatment of tangential loading effects on the Brazilian test stress distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
12
0
9

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
12
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…As also theoretically shown in [29], the stress distribution inside the samples under Brazilian loading is only marginally affected by the effect of the frictional conditions at the boundary. In fact, Fig.…”
Section: Validation Against the Theoretical Solution At Low Stress Levelsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…As also theoretically shown in [29], the stress distribution inside the samples under Brazilian loading is only marginally affected by the effect of the frictional conditions at the boundary. In fact, Fig.…”
Section: Validation Against the Theoretical Solution At Low Stress Levelsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…18 The effect of element size on stress distribution in a model specimen with a geometrical ratio 0.2 and relative width of bearing strip of 0.2 Tensile strength using fracture mechanics concepts 279 would be reasonable to neglect the tangential forces in the main part of the specimen diameter in the Brazilian test. This is consistent with the findings presented by Lavrov and Vervoort (2002).…”
Section: Width Of Bearing Stripssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Recently, theoretical and numerical results indicate that friction between the platen and the specimen can affect the stress distribution in the immediate vicinity of the contact rim. But the stress field at the disc's centre is totally insensitive to the exact distribution of radial pressure and also to the presence or absence of friction (Lavrov and Vervoort 2002;Lanaro et al 2009;Markides et al 2010Markides et al , 2011Markides and Kourkoulis 2013). Thus, the specimens were placed directly between the loading platens and friction was ignored.…”
Section: Test Apparatus and Schemementioning
confidence: 99%