2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4863635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical study on collision dynamics of H+ + CH4 at low energies

Abstract: In this work we make an investigation on collision dynamics of H(+) + CH4 at 30 eV by using time-dependent density functional theory coupled with molecular dynamics approach. All possible reactions are presented based on 9 incident orientations. The calculated fragment intensity is in nice agreement with experimental results. The mechanism of reaction transition for dissociation and proton exchange processes is explained by the intra-molecule energy transfer. However, the energy loss of the proton is in poor a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Higherlevel self-interaction-free approaches like LDA + ADSIC and EXX overestimate the rainbow angle too, but are relatively closer to the experimental results. The AD-SIC results agree with Gao et al [41] and the EXX compare favorably with the HF-based method of Jaquemin et al [40]. Both LDA and PBE show the same features in Octopus and Qbox as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Higherlevel self-interaction-free approaches like LDA + ADSIC and EXX overestimate the rainbow angle too, but are relatively closer to the experimental results. The AD-SIC results agree with Gao et al [41] and the EXX compare favorably with the HF-based method of Jaquemin et al [40]. Both LDA and PBE show the same features in Octopus and Qbox as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This orientation is identical to the Face II orientations of Jacquemin et al [40] and Gao et al [41] in which the incoming proton moves towards the methane from the negative-to-positive z-axis. The impact parameter b was increased in the positive x-axis.…”
Section: Computational Detailssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results are based on 1D models so cannot capture effects from channels where the electron scatters around the target in real systems. Also, whether the errors from the approximate methods are so large for realistic systems with more electrons and vibronic effects, is unclear; still, the results here suggest the tendency of adiabatic TDDFT to underestimate scattering in realistic systems [6,7,8,9,10,11,12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The lack of memory dependence is believed to be responsible for errors in its predictions, e.g., Refs. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], including sometimes qualitative failures. Still, the approximations are often accurate enough to be useful, and some characterization of when to expect the adiabatic approximation to work well has also been done [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%