2001
DOI: 10.1002/qua.1087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical study of the structural, vibrational, and topologic properties of the charge distribution of the molecular complexes between thiophene and Brönsted acid sites of zeolites

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The main interaction between thiophene and zeolites leads to the formation of a hydrogen bond between the S atom of thiophene and the OH group of zeolites, giving 1:1 stable molecular complexes. The present work reports a theoretical study about the structural, vibrational, and topologic properties of the charge distribution of the molecular complexes between thiophene and a series of Brönsted acid sites of zeolites, modeled as the H 3 SiOHAlH 3 (B 1 ), (OH) 3 Si(OH)Al(OH) 3 (B 1 OH), and H 3 Si(OH)Al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(30 reference statements)
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the electron correlation reduces the length of this bond by 7.3%, indicating that these effects are very important in sulfur−zeolitemolecular complexes. The comparison of the S 44 −H 43 bond distance with other results of similar complexes from Table indicate that the CH 3 SH-T1O−OH interaction is larger than the interaction of CH 3 SH with the B2 cluster, CH 3 SH with the B3 cluster, and CH 3 SH with the B4 cluster 18 (B2, B3 and B4, are zeolite clusters with 3, 4, and 5 tetrahedrals, respectively) and thiophene with B2 zeolite . These results show that T10 gives a better representation of the zeolite structure and is able to give a more realistic description of the interaction of zeolites with sulfur compounds than zeolite clusters of smaller sizes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For instance, the electron correlation reduces the length of this bond by 7.3%, indicating that these effects are very important in sulfur−zeolitemolecular complexes. The comparison of the S 44 −H 43 bond distance with other results of similar complexes from Table indicate that the CH 3 SH-T1O−OH interaction is larger than the interaction of CH 3 SH with the B2 cluster, CH 3 SH with the B3 cluster, and CH 3 SH with the B4 cluster 18 (B2, B3 and B4, are zeolite clusters with 3, 4, and 5 tetrahedrals, respectively) and thiophene with B2 zeolite . These results show that T10 gives a better representation of the zeolite structure and is able to give a more realistic description of the interaction of zeolites with sulfur compounds than zeolite clusters of smaller sizes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 50%
“…These structures were fully optimized following C s symmetry. In addition, the present results were compared with previous calculations of the interaction of CH 3 SH with small zeolite clusters and with those of the thiophene−zeolite interaction reported by us . The structures of the isolated CH 3 SH and CH 3 OH molecules were previously fully optimized.…”
Section: Theoretical Methods and Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The distance of the additional hydrogen bonds is ∼2.72Å, revealing strong hydrogen bonds. The complexation energies on monomer M 4 are similar to previously reported DFT calculations of the adsorption of thiophene on clusters representing zeolites (6.1-10.5 kJ/mol) [65]. Experimental adsorption of DBT, 4-MDBT, and 4,6-DMDBT on activated carbons shows that selectivities towards the problematic compounds 4-MDBT, between 1.28 and 2.3, and 4,6-DMDBT, between 1.96 and 3.50, using DBT as reference [66].…”
Section: Complexation Energies and Selectivities Of Dbt 4-mdbt And supporting
confidence: 86%
“…The reason to choose these compounds is that THT, TBM, and DMS (selected from alkyl-thiophenes, thiols, and sulfides) are widely used sulfur odorants for light hydrocarbon fuels that are a cost-effective H 2 source for fuel cells, while CO 2 , H 2 O, H 2 S, and COS are common impurities. Several previous calculation studies on adsorption of individual sulfur species (thiophene, , CH 3 SH, , C 2 H 5 SH, H 2 S) as well as light hydrocarbons, H 2 O, and CO 2 on zeolites can be found in the literature, but their diverse cluster models and levels in the theories taken for the calculations limit a direct and meaningful comparison of the results. Here we present the binding energies of the compounds on simple zeolite model clusters obtained with highly accurate B3LYP and MP2 methods, and discuss the results comparing with experimental sulfur adsorption uptake and selectivity properties of AgNaY zeolites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%