2016
DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/3/9/096104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical study of the role of charge ordering in antiferromagnetically ordered manganites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microscopic model study and phase diagram of multiferroic perovskite manganites (Mochizuki and Furukawa, 2009) shows that the strength of NN and NNN coupling are comparable and the NNN coupling plays a vital role in determining the magnetic properties. Considering only the NN interaction in a DE model in the presence of ferromagnetism (FM) and charge ordering (CO), the studies of magnetisation (Rout et al, 2009a;Panda and Rout, 2009), magnetic susceptibility , velocity of sound (Rout and Panda, 2009), Raman spectra ) and for AFM-CO manganites study of the tunnelling conductance spectra (Panda et al, 2016) successfully explained MI transition and strong electron-phonon interaction in CMR manganites. Further the studies of magnetic susceptibility (Rout et al, 2007), magnetoresistivity (Rout et al, 2009b) for an FM-JT model in the presence of hybridisation interaction between conduction and core electrons and study of resistivity for the same FM-JT model in the presence DE interaction (Rout et al, 2011;Panda et al, 2012) explain the CMR effect below T C .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microscopic model study and phase diagram of multiferroic perovskite manganites (Mochizuki and Furukawa, 2009) shows that the strength of NN and NNN coupling are comparable and the NNN coupling plays a vital role in determining the magnetic properties. Considering only the NN interaction in a DE model in the presence of ferromagnetism (FM) and charge ordering (CO), the studies of magnetisation (Rout et al, 2009a;Panda and Rout, 2009), magnetic susceptibility , velocity of sound (Rout and Panda, 2009), Raman spectra ) and for AFM-CO manganites study of the tunnelling conductance spectra (Panda et al, 2016) successfully explained MI transition and strong electron-phonon interaction in CMR manganites. Further the studies of magnetic susceptibility (Rout et al, 2007), magnetoresistivity (Rout et al, 2009b) for an FM-JT model in the presence of hybridisation interaction between conduction and core electrons and study of resistivity for the same FM-JT model in the presence DE interaction (Rout et al, 2011;Panda et al, 2012) explain the CMR effect below T C .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microscopic model study and phase diagram of multiferroic perovskite manganites (Mochizuki and Furukawa, 2009) shows that the strength of NN and NNN coupling are comparable and the NNN coupling plays a vital role in determining the magnetic properties. Considering only the NN interaction in a DE model in the presence of ferromagnetism (FM) and charge ordering (CO), the studies of magnetisation (Rout et al, 2009a;Panda and Rout, 2009), magnetic susceptibility , velocity of sound (Rout and Panda, 2009), Raman spectra ) and for AFM-CO manganites study of the tunnelling conductance spectra (Panda et al, 2016) successfully explained MI transition and strong electron-phonon interaction in CMR manganites. Further the studies of magnetic susceptibility (Rout et al, 2007), magnetoresistivity (Rout et al, 2009b) for an FM-JT model in the presence of hybridisation interaction between conduction and core electrons and study of resistivity for the same FM-JT model in the presence DE interaction (Rout et al, 2011;Panda et al, 2012) explain the CMR effect below T C .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%