2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10946-009-9061-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical study of the electronic structure of LiNa and LiNa+ molecules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
13
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, our potential energy curve relative to the 2 2 Σ + state exhibits an energy minimum occurring at an equilibrium internuclear distance R e =14.83 a.u, with a corresponding dissociation energy D e =307 cm −1 and vibration constants ω e =36.984 cm −1 and ω e χ e =1.115 cm −1 . Therefore, contrary to the conclusion of Magnier and Frécon [2], and as predicted by previous ab-initio methods [1,26], present study confirms the attractive behaviour of the 2 2 Σ + state.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, our potential energy curve relative to the 2 2 Σ + state exhibits an energy minimum occurring at an equilibrium internuclear distance R e =14.83 a.u, with a corresponding dissociation energy D e =307 cm −1 and vibration constants ω e =36.984 cm −1 and ω e χ e =1.115 cm −1 . Therefore, contrary to the conclusion of Magnier and Frécon [2], and as predicted by previous ab-initio methods [1,26], present study confirms the attractive behaviour of the 2 2 Σ + state.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…For the X 2 Σ + ground state, present calculations yield a dissociation energy D e =8331 cm −1 and an equilibrium distance R e =6.26 a.u. These values may be compared to the ab-initio results of Berriche [1], D e =8061 cm −1 and R e =6.37 a.u, and to those of Khelifi et al [26], D e =8155 cm −1 and R e =6.29 a.u. Our vibration constants ω e =194.88 cm −1 and ω e χ e = 1.14 cm −1 , also compare well to the ab-initio ones [1], ω e =192.98 cm −1 and ω e χ e =1.11 cm −1 , however due to the nonavailability of the experimental values, we simply mention that our dissociation energy which is slightly greater than other available theoretical values, compares favourably to the experimental value [33] predicted in the range D e =7985±242cm −1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations