1992
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-55602-8_172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical study of symmetries in propositional calculus and applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aguirre [1] and Crawford, Ginsberg, Luks and Roy [7] each define symmetry similarly: if S is a set of clauses in CNF, then a permutation % of the variables in those clauses is a symmetry of S if %ðSÞ ¼ S. The expression %ðSÞ denotes the result of applying the permutation % to the clauses in S. If this permutation simply reorders the literals in individual clauses, and reorders the clauses, then it leaves S effectively unchanged, and so in this case %ðSÞ ¼ S and % is a symmetry. Benhamou and Sais [4] use a slightly more general definition, in which a symmetry is a permutation defined on the set of literals that preserves the set of clauses. For example, given two variables x and y, x may be mapped to :y.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aguirre [1] and Crawford, Ginsberg, Luks and Roy [7] each define symmetry similarly: if S is a set of clauses in CNF, then a permutation % of the variables in those clauses is a symmetry of S if %ðSÞ ¼ S. The expression %ðSÞ denotes the result of applying the permutation % to the clauses in S. If this permutation simply reorders the literals in individual clauses, and reorders the clauses, then it leaves S effectively unchanged, and so in this case %ðSÞ ¼ S and % is a symmetry. Benhamou and Sais [4] use a slightly more general definition, in which a symmetry is a permutation defined on the set of literals that preserves the set of clauses. For example, given two variables x and y, x may be mapped to :y.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aguirre [1] and Crawford, Ginsberg, Luks & Roy [6] each define symmetry similarly: if S is a set of clauses in CNF, then a permutation π of the variables in those clauses is a symmetry of S if π(S) = S. The expression π(S) denotes the result of applying the permutation π to the clauses in S. If this permutation simply re-orders the literals in individual clauses, and reorders the clauses, then it leaves S effectively unchanged, and so in this case π(S) = S and π is a symmetry. Benhamou and Sais [4] use a slightly more general definition, in which a symmetry is a permutation defined on the set of literals that preserves the set of clauses. For example, given two variables x and y, x may be mapped to ¬y.…”
Section: V K } ⊆ V and A I ∈ D For All I Such That 1 ≤ I ≤ K Notmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Symmetries can be classified into semantic or syntactic [5]. Semantic symmetries are permutations of the formula that preserves its set of the models (or solutions) and, therefore, can be regarded as properties of the underlying Boolean function, independent of the particular syntactic representation.…”
Section: Symmetries In Automated Theorem Provingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, many articles discuss how to detect and exploit syntactic symmetries in SAT solving [7,5,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Symmetries have been also extensively investigated and successfully exploited in other domains besides SAT like Constraint Satisfaction Problem [15,16], Integer Programming [17,18], Planning [19,20], Model Checking [21,22,23,24], Quantified Boolean Formulas (QBF) [25,26,27], and Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) [28,29,30].…”
Section: Symmetries In Automated Theorem Provingmentioning
confidence: 99%