2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2011.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical study of inclusion complexation of 3-amino-5-nitrobenzisothiazole with β-cyclodextrin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interaction energy (eq 4) is defined as the difference between the energy of the complex and the sum of the energies of both partners at their complex geometry. The deformation energy (eq 5) is determined by the difference between the energy of one of the partners of the complex and its energy at the complex geometry [30]. E CD in the complex is the single point energy value of CD in the optimized complex [31][34].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction energy (eq 4) is defined as the difference between the energy of the complex and the sum of the energies of both partners at their complex geometry. The deformation energy (eq 5) is determined by the difference between the energy of one of the partners of the complex and its energy at the complex geometry [30]. E CD in the complex is the single point energy value of CD in the optimized complex [31][34].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction and deformation energy (DEF) for each host and guest component during complex formation is the difference between the optimized component compared to its energy in the complex (Eq. ( 2)) [49]:…”
Section: Page 3/19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10][11] Some irregular energy differences in the interactions between enantiomers and selectors were found by using various molecular modeling methods. [12][13][14][15][16][17] Nevertheless, because of the computational limitations of low levels of theory, or the non-quantitative nature of theoretical studies with respect to qualitative analyses, the results of previous studies could only be used to interpret the mechanism of enantiomeric separation, but could not be used to predict the possibility of separation before the CE experiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%