1974
DOI: 10.1063/1.1682533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical study of curve crossing: ab initio calculations on the four lowest 1Σ+ states of LiF

Abstract: Accurate ab initio potential energy curves for the classic Li-F ionic-covalent interaction by extrapolation to the complete basis set limit and modeling of the radial nonadiabatic couplingThe potential curves of the four lowest 1 ~ + states of LiF have been studied by ab initio configuration interaction methods, using a contracted Gaussian basis set of better than double-' quality, augmented with diffuse basis functions on the fluorine atom. The choice of orbitals and selection of configurations were carried o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As already pointed out in the introduction the LiF molecule has been frequently studied in the literature by various groups [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The ionic and covalent states of 1 Σ + symmetry assemble an avoided crossing for an inter-atomic distance of ∼11.5 a.u.…”
Section: Avoided Crossing Of Lithium Fluoridementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As already pointed out in the introduction the LiF molecule has been frequently studied in the literature by various groups [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The ionic and covalent states of 1 Σ + symmetry assemble an avoided crossing for an inter-atomic distance of ∼11.5 a.u.…”
Section: Avoided Crossing Of Lithium Fluoridementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it has been frequently used in the literature as a benchmark system. Initially there were MCSCF and CI calculations of Kahn et al [1], Botter et al [2], and Werner et al [3]. Later Spiegelmann et al [4,5] applied effective Hamiltonian techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Within the CI approaches, highly correlated configuration interaction 11 ͑HCCI͒ methods, viz., CI going well beyond the singles and doubles treatment, constitutes a practical alternative to using a full Hamiltonian representation, particularly after the developments in the companion paper 12 to be referred to as I. One possibility is to select a priori a subspace S having invariant properties with respect to separate unitary transformations of the occupied orbitals and of distinct sets of correlation orbitals grouped in a well-defined manner, 11 giving rise to multireference CI ͑MRCI͒, [13][14][15][16][17][18] complete active space ͑CAS͒ CI, 19 restricted active space ͑RAS͒ CI, 20 and so on. 21 The corresponding CI-matrix eigenvalue problem is…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This system has been subject of various earlier theoretical studies [4,5,6]. Kahn, Hay and Shavitt [4] calculated the four lowest 1 Σ + states using the configurationinteraction (CI) methods. The dipole moment function for the lowest 1 Σ + states was studied by Werner and Meyer [6] using MCSCF wave functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter methods focus on dynamic correlation and are mandatory for achieving quantitative agreement with experiment. A frequently studied test system for the quantitative calculation of electron correlation effects in molecules is the ionic-neutral avoided crossing in the potential curves of alkaline halogenides, in particular of LiF [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. The goal of these benchmark studies is the development of a computational protocol which provides a globally accurate description of the system even though the wave functions change dramatically transversing the avoided crossing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%