2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.theochem.2010.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical studies on the proton affinities of four different series of nano-size diamines and designing strong superbases based on fullerene(C60) molecule

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(51 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typical “Proton Sponge” compounds are reluctant to add a second proton. The difference between the first and second proton affinities which we calculated for np(NMe 2 ) 2 is an enormous 127.4 kcal mol –1 , in reasonable agreement with the recently published value of 132.9 kcal mol –1 . It is instructive to compare 3a with np(NSIDM) 2 in this context, since both compounds differ only in their backbone (fc vs np).…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Typical “Proton Sponge” compounds are reluctant to add a second proton. The difference between the first and second proton affinities which we calculated for np(NMe 2 ) 2 is an enormous 127.4 kcal mol –1 , in reasonable agreement with the recently published value of 132.9 kcal mol –1 . It is instructive to compare 3a with np(NSIDM) 2 in this context, since both compounds differ only in their backbone (fc vs np).…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The difference between the first and second proton affinities which we calculated for np(NMe 2 ) 2 is an enormous 127.4 kcal mol −1 , in reasonable agreement with the recently published value of 132.9 kcal mol −1 . 44 It is instructive to compare 3a with np(NSIDM) 2 in this context, since both compounds differ only in their backbone (fc vs np). The PA value of 3a is 2 kcal mol −1 higher than that of the "Proton Sponge" np(NSIDM) 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many new classes of nonionic superbases have been designed, and many of them have been prepared during the past decade. Among these are guanidinophosphazenes, various types of proton sponges, superbasic guanidine derivatives, ,, macrocyclic proton chelators, , chiral phosphazenes, , quinones, phosphonium ylides, ,, azaphosphatranes, , carbenes, ,, etc. , Theoretical calculations predict that many of these bases are more basic than the most basic experimentally measured compoundP 2 -phosphazene EtP 2 (dma) 5 (dma = dimethylamino; see Chart for its structure; GB = 264 kcal mol –1 ) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DFT-B3LYP and MP2 calculations for diazanaphthalenes give D 2 /D 1 0.5 [25]. DFT calculations for a series of diamines containing hydrocarbon bridges give D 2 /D 1 ∼ 0.8 − 0.9 [26]. For uracil, DFT-B3LYP calculations give a proton affinity of 800-900 kJ/mol depending on the protonation site and the tautomer, and a deprotonation enthalpy of 1350-1450 kJ/mol [27].…”
Section: Model Parameter Values For Specific Moleculesmentioning
confidence: 99%