Topics in Nucleic Acid Structure 1982
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-06007-8_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical studies of nucleic acid conformation: potential energies, chain statistics, and model building

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 263 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The limits of each envelope are determined by where the probability of observation drops to zero. Our method of empirical binning differs from previous methods that use ranges de®ned by equivalent limits on either side of ideal torsion angles (11). Thus, the descriptions anti, gauche+ and gauche± are not fully equivalent to the bins used here.…”
Section: Binningmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The limits of each envelope are determined by where the probability of observation drops to zero. Our method of empirical binning differs from previous methods that use ranges de®ned by equivalent limits on either side of ideal torsion angles (11). Thus, the descriptions anti, gauche+ and gauche± are not fully equivalent to the bins used here.…”
Section: Binningmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Because of their multi-peaked nature, the remaining four torsion angles and P allow a straightforward separation into distinct con®guration classes. However, d and P are correlated, both by geometric de®nition (11,13), and from analysis of the HM 23S rRNA data. Thus, to avoid redundancy, we eliminate P and consider only four torsion angles, a, g, d and z.…”
Section: Binningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These plots show a superposition of results for each step in the dodecamer, and thus generic rather than sequence-specific behavior. The shaded areas in these dials are the range of values of each torsion that have been deduced from independent model building considerations (Olson, 1982a,b) to be sterically unfavorable. The MD results strongly support the predicted conformationally allowed regions.…”
Section: Conformational Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Helices in the A 2 B 2 hyperfamily adopt the conformational switch ®rst characterized in dimer steps at the ends of B-DNA dodecamer duplexes (Grzeskowiak et al, 1991) and anticipated in early DNA computations (Zhurkin et al, 1978;Olson, 1982b). We use the subscript 2 to emphasize the conformational similarity of our computed structures with these so-called B(II) states where the ez rotations about the C3 H ÐO3 H and O3 H Ð P bonds adopt g À t combinations rather than the tg À arrangements typical of canonical A 1 B 1 duplexes, the b angle about the O5 H ÐC5 H bond decreases by 30-70 , and the w angle orienting the sugar and base rises by 40-60 to the high anti range (see Table 1).…”
Section: A T B T Hyperfamilymentioning
confidence: 99%