1992
DOI: 10.1021/ja00048a032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical secondary kinetic isotope effects and the interpretation of transition state geometries. 1. The Cope rearrangement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[31] We use 1.0 (0.0) and 0.0 (1.0) as n R , and n P for the C À X (Nu À C) bond, respectively, and adopt a = 0.6 based on the suggestion in the literature. [31][32][33] The results are listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31] We use 1.0 (0.0) and 0.0 (1.0) as n R , and n P for the C À X (Nu À C) bond, respectively, and adopt a = 0.6 based on the suggestion in the literature. [31][32][33] The results are listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2)]. The C 2h -symmetric structure is a transition structure at B3LYPS, but an intermediate at MP2/S, [53] while its associated transition state is dissymmetric with CÀC bond-breaking/forming lengths of 1.761 and 1.814 , indicating an asynchronous diradicaloid pathway; no open shell singlet states were located. However, the difference in activation energy between MP2/L//B3LYPS and MP2/L//MP2/S is only 1.0 kcal mol À1 and at SCS-MP2/L even smaller (0.8 kcal mol…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of KIEs in such reactions is of particular interest. There have been numerous experimental [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]22,23 and theoretical [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] studies performed on proton transfer in systems of chemical and biochemical interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%