“…We feel, therefore, that the theory presented by Senior and Siegel is based on a -12 ' ' '] ', I ,i , t, , ,, , , , -4o i,, A ,': ', ',' ' ', ' ' • ,•, I , ', ,"x,•o false premise, one that is in direct conflict with the experimental evidence. Hughes [1960] and Hayre [1961] as well as one of us [Evans, 1962b] have criticized Senior and Siegel's theory at length, and hence there seems little to be gained by discussing it further. It suiTices to say that we do not accept the value k = 1.1 for the dielectric constant of the lunar surface obtained by these authors.…”