2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical re-evaluations of the black hole mass–bulge mass relation – I. Effect of seed black hole mass

Abstract: We explore the effect of varying the mass of the seed black hole on the resulting black hole mass -bulge mass relation at z ∼ 0, using a semi-analytic model of galaxy formation combined with large cosmological N -body simulations. We constrain our model by requiring the observed properties of galaxies at z ∼ 0 are reproduced. In keeping with previous semi-analytic models, we place a seed black hole immediately after a galaxy forms. When the mass of the seed is set at 10 5 M ⊙ , we find that the model results b… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
18
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
18
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This modelling is similar to previous SA models (e.g. Fanidakis et al 2012;Shirakata et al 2016;Pezzulli et al 2017 AGN LFs compared with that with the KH00model, since the Galmodel has the accretion timescale with the same order as the KH00model as shown later in Fig. 6.…”
Section: The Effect Of the Accretion Timescale On Agn Lfssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This modelling is similar to previous SA models (e.g. Fanidakis et al 2012;Shirakata et al 2016;Pezzulli et al 2017 AGN LFs compared with that with the KH00model, since the Galmodel has the accretion timescale with the same order as the KH00model as shown later in Fig. 6.…”
Section: The Effect Of the Accretion Timescale On Agn Lfssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, "heavy seed BHs" should form only in special conditions (e.g. Omukai et al 2008) and thus such "heavy seed BHs" should not be dominant (see also Shirakata et al 2016). Although the formation time of the seed BH of SMBHs with > 10 9 M at z > 6 is unclear, the super-Eddington growth might play a key role in the early growth of SMBHs since the typical Eddington ratio becomes higher at higher redshift (Wu et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See also Fig.1 in Greene 2012) in her recent review of IMBHs. In addition to the different "sizes" of IMBHs predicted by the two scenarios, the direct collapse scenario predicts a much lower occupation fraction in low-mass galaxies than the Pop III remnant scenario [60] (but also see Shirakata et al 2016 implications [61]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%