2009
DOI: 10.1063/1.3241993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical prediction of turbulent skin friction on geometrically complex surfaces

Abstract: This article can be considered as an extension of the paper of Fukagata et al. ͓Phys. Fluids 14, L73 ͑2002͔͒ which derived an analytical expression for the constituent contributions to skin friction in a turbulent channel, pipe, and plane boundary layer flows. In this paper, we extend the theoretical analysis of Fukagata et al. ͑formerly limited to canonical cases with two-dimensional mean flow͒ to a fully three-dimensional situation allowing complex wall shapes. We start our analysis by considering arbitraril… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the impact of turbulence on skin friction can be clearly quantified and localized within the boundary layer thickness. This method has then been generalized to compressible flow [19] and to some complex wall surfaces [20]. The effect of riblets on each of the drag-contributing terms could shed more light on their drag-reducing mechanisms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the impact of turbulence on skin friction can be clearly quantified and localized within the boundary layer thickness. This method has then been generalized to compressible flow [19] and to some complex wall surfaces [20]. The effect of riblets on each of the drag-contributing terms could shed more light on their drag-reducing mechanisms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the shape and the size of these technological devices can impose severe constraints on the grid design. For example, riblets (thin slots manufactured on the blade wall) are known to be an effective solution to reduce losses [41,42] but their size is only a few dozen micrometres, compared to a few dozen millimetres for the blade span (figure 2).Steady RANS simulations are already used to partially address these challenges, but the lack of validation of turbulence models in complex configurations limits the predictive capability of CFD. Even the use of unsteady RANS has a limited impact on the flow prediction [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the geometric complexity of our flow, the original FIK's formulation cannot be applied as is. Following Peet and Sagaut [17] who derived the equivalent of FIK's channel flow decomposition for three-dimensional complex wall shape, a similar formula can be obtained from FIK's boundary layer formulation:…”
Section: Analysis Of the Wall Frictionmentioning
confidence: 99%