2009
DOI: 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2009.89
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical prediction of hysteretic rubber friction in ball on plate configuration by finite element method

Abstract: Abstract. This paper has investigated theoretically the influence of sliding speed and temperature on the hysteretic friction in case of a smooth, reciprocating steel ball sliding on smooth rubber plate by finite element method (FEM). Generalized Maxwell-models combined with Mooney-Rivlin model have been used to describe the material behaviour of the ethylenepropylene-diene-monomer (EPDM) rubber studied. Additionally, the effect of the technique applied at the parameter identification of the material model and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hysterisis friction coefficient (μ hys ) can be expressed by Eq . 2 [16]: where ν is the Poisson ratio, E is the equivalent elastic modulus of the contacting bodies, and p av was the average contact pressure. Supposing that K 2 , p in Eq .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hysterisis friction coefficient (μ hys ) can be expressed by Eq . 2 [16]: where ν is the Poisson ratio, E is the equivalent elastic modulus of the contacting bodies, and p av was the average contact pressure. Supposing that K 2 , p in Eq .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated in Stage II, where both fixed and rigid steel connector and pin side wall are in contact with each other, mainly at the area between the rubber and the counter surface, friction could possibly be the cause of the failure. Friction is one of the failure mechanism which is due to two physical phenomena which are (i) adhesion between the surfaces and (ii) is hysteresis loss in rubber [13]. In this case, as the rubber bush slides repeatedly on the side wall counter surface which is rigid compared to rubber, and through time the surface of the steel could deform the rubber surface.…”
Section: Fig 4 Track Pin Adnan -Malaysian Armoured Vehiclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 for room temperature and 150 • C can be considered as upper estimates as regards the COF. More in detail about this investigation can be found in [17,18].…”
Section: Fe Model Of the Ball On Plate Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The details of the generalized Maxwell model fitting can be seen in [9,10,[18][19][20].The non-linear stress-strain behaviour of the rubber was modelled with the frequently used Mooney-Rivlin model applying two parameters [21] with values of c 10 = 406.66 MPa and C 01 = 106, 66 MPa (E 0 = 3050 MPa) The construction of the generalized Maxwell model in detail can be found in [10,[18][19][20].…”
Section: Fitting Of the Generalized Maxwell-model To The Master Curvementioning
confidence: 99%